Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Arhuliya Devi @ Arhula DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Summary

Arhuliya Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was implicated in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that she, along with others, participated in the murder of the victim by setting her ablaze after dowry demands were unmet. The petitioner contended she was innocent, had no criminal antecedent, and was falsely implicated, seeking bail. The State opposed the bail application. After considering the allegations, the petitioner’s clean record, and the nature of the case, the court granted bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, with conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. The order was made pending the petitioner’s arrest or surrender within six weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner Arhuliya Devi in a dowry‑death case under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • dowry death
  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • over‑implication
  • mother‑in‑law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26041 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2026 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Arhuliya Devi @ Arhula Devi Wife of Chandeshwar Yadav Resident of
                 Village- Behata, P.S.- Khajauli, District- Madhubani
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Kumari Pallavi, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case

                   registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita.

                               3. As per the prosecution case, informant solemnized

                   the marriage of his daughter with co-accused Nilesh Kumar

                   Yadav one year prior to the occurrence. After marriage, the

                   husband and in-laws of informant’s daughter started demanding

                   dowry. Due to non-fulfillment of the same, she was tortured and

                   ill treated. It is further alleged that on 14.01.2026, all the F.I.R.

                   named accused persons including this petitioner killed the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26041 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                            2/3




          daughter of informant by setting her body on fire.

                    4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

          submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been

          implicated in the present case. Further submission is that

          petitioner is mother-in-law of the victim. Petitioner is victim of

          over implication. She is separate in mess and property and has

          never tortured the deceased and demanded any dowry. The

          victim sustained burn injuries while cooking food and she was

          taken to hospital but died in the way. Thrust of accusation is

          against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody since

          15.01.2026. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and she

          undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial.

                          5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

          the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                          6. Having considered the facts and circumstances

          of the case, submissions on behalf of the parties, nature of

          allegation against the petitioner and her fair criminal antecedent,

          let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event

          of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a

          period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

          10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-I,
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26041 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      Madhubani in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 11 of

                      2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                      482(2) of the B.N.S.S.



                                              (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
utkarsh/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.