Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shams TabrezversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The modification application is dismissed.

Summary

Shams Tabrez filed an application seeking modification of a condition (paragraph 15) in an order dated 17‑01‑2026 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 50943 of 2025. The petitioner failed to appear before the learned District Court and provided no information on compliance with the earlier order, merely stating he could not appear on the date fixed by the High Court. The Court observed that this lack of due diligence, coupled with the bar under Section 403 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, precluded granting the modification. Consequently, the modification application was dismissed. The Court, however, directed the petitioner to approach the District Court for possible amicable mediation.

Issues considered

  • Whether the modification application can be entertained when the petitioner has not appeared before the District Court and has not shown compliance with the earlier order.
  • Whether the bar under Section 403 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act applies to the petitioner's request for modification.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • modification of order
  • due diligence
  • Section 403
  • Bihar Negotiable Securities Act
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • mediation

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29048 of 2026
                                              In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50943 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-856 Year-2021 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                          Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Shams Tabrez S/o Nehal Khan R/O-Jamshedpur Jugsalaye Gauri Shankar
                 Road, Pahalvan Road, District- East -Singhbhum, Jharkhand

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Nilofar Khanam D/o Akhtar Khan R/o C 36, Indrapuri, Samanpura, Raza
                 Bazar, Distt.- Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      None
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   19-06-2026                     No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr.

                   Humayou Ahmad Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State is present.

                                2. I find from the modification application that the

                   petitioner has sought for modification of the condition contained

                   in paragraph no. 15 of the order dated 17.01.2026 passed in

                   Criminal Miscellaneous No. 50943 of 2025, but has not given

                   any information, as to whether, after the said date, he has

                   appeared before the learned District Court. Merely giving

                   information that he could not appear on 19.02.2026, the date

                   fixed by this Court for appearance of the parties before the

                   learned District Court, cannot be considered that he has taken
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29048 of 2026(3) dt.19-06-2026
                                                          2/2




                        due diligence to comply with the order dated 17.01.2026.

                                     3. In such circumstances, considering the conduct of

                        the petitioner and the bar contained under Section 403 of the

                        BNSS, I am not inclined to allow the present modification

                        application.

                                     4. Accordingly, the present modification application is

                        dismissed.

                                     5. However, the petitioner may approach the learned

                        District Court for allowing the parties to mediate outside the

                        Court amicably.



                                                  (Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.