Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aditya Jaiswal @ Bunty JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court grants bail to the petitioner subject to monetary and procedural conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Aditya Jaiswal, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 121 litres of liquor, including 94.4 litres from a scooty, were recovered. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no liquor was found in his possession, and that his name surfaced only through statements of co‑accused, while the vehicle involved did not belong to him. The petitioner had been in custody since 8 July 2025 and possessed four prior criminal antecedents, and the prosecution argued that Section 103 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 had not been complied with. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence and the petitioner’s record. The Court, after weighing the lack of direct incriminating material, the duration of custody, and the petitioner’s claim of innocence, decided to grant bail. Bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs 15,000 with two sureties and specific undertakings regarding appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and refraining from similar offences.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite being charged under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and having prior criminal antecedents
  • Whether compliance with Section 103 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 is a prerequisite for granting bail in this case

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • criminal procedure
  • antecedents
  • evidence tampering

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3154 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2025 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Aditya Jaiswal @ Bunty Jaiswal S/o Rajendra Jaiswal @ Tuntun Jaiswal R/o
                 Vill- Guthni Purvi, P.S.- Guthni, Distt- Siwan

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mrs.Nirmala Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   12-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               2. The petitioner seeks bail in Guthni P.S. case No.

                   240 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) and

                   41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 121 liters

                   liquor was         recovered out of which 94.4 liters liquor was

                   recovered from Scooty.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case.       No incriminating material has been recovered

                   from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner

                   has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3154 of 2026(3) dt.12-02-2026
                                            2/3




          further submitted the name of the petitioner has transpired on

          the basis of disclosure made by apprehended co-accused. The

          vehicles in question do not belong to the petitioner.             The

          petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2025 and has got four

          criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of

          B.N.S.S., 2023.

                      5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case and the period of custody undergone by the

          petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

          below/concerned Court in connection with Guthni P.S. case

          No. 240 of 2025 subject to the following conditions:

                       (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

          the family of the petitioner.

                       (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          fixed at the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive

          dates without sufficient cause.

                       (III) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3154 of 2026(3) dt.12-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     or the witnesses during the trial.

                                  (IV) Petitioner shall not commit offence of similar

                     nature in future.

                                  If any of the above conditions are violated, the Trial

                     Court shall be at liberty to              cancel the bail bonds of the

                     petitioner.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Pankaj/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.