Patna High Court
Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Holding
The Court held that anticipatory bail should be granted as the petitioner had no constructive possession of the illegal liquor and no prior criminal record.
Summary
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after his truck was seized by police, who recovered 120 litres of illegal spirit and bottle caps, leading to an FIR under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 30(a), 30(d) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he had no knowledge of the illicit liquor, that the vehicle was left unattended on the roadside, and that he had no criminal antecedent. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure was lawful as the vehicle was unattended. The Court examined the lack of constructive possession by the petitioner and his clean record, and concluded that anticipatory bail was appropriate. Consequently, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner can be arrested under Section 318(4) B.N.S.S. and the relevant provisions of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
- Whether anticipatory bail is warranted given the absence of constructive possession and lack of criminal antecedent.
- Whether conditions under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. may be imposed on the anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 318(4), 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act — s. 30(a), 30(d), 32
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illegal liquor
- constructive possession
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
- Section 318
- Section 482
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33990 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2026 Thana- SONO District- Jamui
======================================================
Dhiraj Kumar S/o Rajpati Singh R/o Village- Imbrahimpur Bihat, P.S. Ba-
rauni, District- Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 21-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties through
virtual mode.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Sono P.S. Case No.40 of 2026, F.I.R. dated
02.03.2026, registered for the offences punishable under Section
318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and 30(a), 30(d), 32 of
Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, on the basis of secret
information, the police recovered 120 liters of illegal spirit and
650 pieces of bottle caps of illegal liquor from a truck bearing
Registration No.BR-9PB3882.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this
case for ulterior reasons. The recovery has been made from a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33990 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
2/3
truck belonging to the petitioner, however, from the perusal of
the FIR itself, it appears that the truck was standing on the
roadside and despite waiting for a considerable time, neither the
driver nor the co-driver came near the vehicle. Thereafter, the
vehicle was taken to the police station where search and seizure
were conducted. It is further submitted that the truck had been
handed over to the driver and the petitioner had no knowledge
regarding the alleged illegal activities. Learned counsel further
submits that the petitioner is in no way connected with the
seized liquor. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is
ready to abide by all terms and conditions as may be imposed by
this Court while granting the privilege of anticipatory bail.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail and submits that the truck was found parked on
the roadside and since nobody came forward for a considerable
period, the vehicle was taken to the police station where search
and seizure were carried out.
6. Regard being had to the submissions made by the
parties, and taking into consideration the fact that the illicit
liquor has not been recovered from the constructive possession
of the petitioner and that the petitioner has no criminal
antecedent, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33990 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
3/3
petitioners.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on
anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the
court below within a period of four weeks from today on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise act, Jhanjharpur in
connection with Madhepur P.S. Case No.40 of 2026 subject to
the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.,
2023.
(Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.