Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that anticipatory bail should be granted as the petitioner had no constructive possession of the illegal liquor and no prior criminal record.

Summary

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after his truck was seized by police, who recovered 120 litres of illegal spirit and bottle caps, leading to an FIR under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 30(a), 30(d) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he had no knowledge of the illicit liquor, that the vehicle was left unattended on the roadside, and that he had no criminal antecedent. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure was lawful as the vehicle was unattended. The Court examined the lack of constructive possession by the petitioner and his clean record, and concluded that anticipatory bail was appropriate. Consequently, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner can be arrested under Section 318(4) B.N.S.S. and the relevant provisions of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
  • Whether anticipatory bail is warranted given the absence of constructive possession and lack of criminal antecedent.
  • Whether conditions under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. may be imposed on the anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • constructive possession
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • Section 318
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33990 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2026 Thana- SONO District- Jamui
                 ======================================================
                 Dhiraj Kumar S/o Rajpati Singh R/o Village- Imbrahimpur Bihat, P.S. Ba-
                 rauni, District- Begusarai

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Bipin Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s:        Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   21-05-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the parties through

                   virtual mode.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Sono P.S. Case No.40 of 2026, F.I.R. dated

                   02.03.2026, registered for the offences punishable under Section

                   318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and 30(a), 30(d), 32 of

                   Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, on the basis of secret

                   information, the police recovered 120 liters of illegal spirit and

                   650 pieces of bottle caps of illegal liquor from a truck bearing

                   Registration No.BR-9PB3882.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

                   case for ulterior reasons. The recovery has been made from a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33990 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                            2/3




          truck belonging to the petitioner, however, from the perusal of

          the FIR itself, it appears that the truck was standing on the

          roadside and despite waiting for a considerable time, neither the

          driver nor the co-driver came near the vehicle. Thereafter, the

          vehicle was taken to the police station where search and seizure

          were conducted. It is further submitted that the truck had been

          handed over to the driver and the petitioner had no knowledge

          regarding the alleged illegal activities. Learned counsel further

          submits that the petitioner is in no way connected with the

          seized liquor. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is

          ready to abide by all terms and conditions as may be imposed by

          this Court while granting the privilege of anticipatory bail.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail and submits that the truck was found parked on

          the roadside and since nobody came forward for a considerable

          period, the vehicle was taken to the police station where search

          and seizure were carried out.

                       6. Regard being had to the submissions made by the

          parties, and taking into consideration the fact that the illicit

          liquor has not been recovered from the constructive possession

          of the petitioner and that the petitioner has no criminal

          antecedent, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33990 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                                           3/3




                         petitioners.

                                      7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on

                         anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the

                         court below within a period of four weeks from today on

                         furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each

                         with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                         learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise act, Jhanjharpur in

                         connection with Madhepur P.S. Case No.40 of 2026 subject to

                         the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.,

                         2023.



                                                                       (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.