Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Summary

The petitioners, Pankaj Kumar (alias Pankaj Rai), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kathaiya P.S. Case No. 91 of 2026) involving alleged possession of illicit foreign liquor under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that a large quantity of liquor was recovered from a tank near the petitioner’s poultry farm, and that the petitioner and another individual were identified as owners. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated based on secret information, had no connection to the seized liquor or the location, and that the identification was merely the result of villagers’ statements. The State opposed the anticipatory bail. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in the alleged offence under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged connection to the seized liquor is sufficient to deny bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • illicit liquor
  • false implication
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35299 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2026 Thana- KATHAIYA District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Rai S/o Balendra Rai @ Baleshwar Ray Resident of
                 Village- Aswari Banjaria, P.S.- Kathaiya, District- Muzaffarpur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Sucheta Yadav, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the parties through virtual

                   mode.

                                2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

                   connection with Kathaiya P.S. Case No. 91 of 2026, registered

                   for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a)/ 41(1)/42(2) of

                   Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, on a written report by

                   Sub-Inspector Om Pukar Priya, who received information that

                   illicit foreign liquor was concealed near Pankaj Ray’s poultry

                   farm. On reaching the spot, two persons fled away. During

                   search, 955.440 liters of illicit liquor were recovered from a

                   brick tank near a maize field. The labourers disclosed the names

                   of Pankaj Rai and Manish Kumar as owners of the seized liquor.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35299 of 2026(2) dt.27-05-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case

          merely on the basis of secret information. It is further submitted

          that the petitioners have no concern with the seized liquor or the

          place of recovery. It has further been submitted that the said

          recovery has been made from a poultry farm which belongs to

          Pankaj Rai and the said place is in noway connected to this

          petitioner. It has further been submitted that the recovery is

          made from a tank adjacent to a maize field near Pankaj Rai’s

          poultry farm situated on the road from Aswari Banjariya village

          to Parsauni. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is

          noway connected to the place of seizure and his name has been

          transpired on the basis of secret information, a raid was

          conducted and the name of this petitioner has been taken by the

          villagers. It has fairly been submitted that the petitioner one

          criminal antecedent which is not akin to the recent case and the

          petitioner is on bail in that case and are ready to abide by all

          terms and conditions as may be imposed by this Court while

          granting the privilege of anticipatory bail.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail application.

                       6. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35299 of 2026(2) dt.27-05-2026
                                                          3/3




                        anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the

                        court below within a period of four weeks from today on

                        furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each

                        with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        learned Exclusive Spl, Excise Court-II, Muzaffarpur in

                        connection with Kathaiya P.S. Case No. 91 of 2026, subject to

                        the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.,

                        2023.



                                                      (Ajit Kumar, J)
niku/anuj/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.