Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rahul Kumar @ Ramu Kumar @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to bond and surety conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with an excise case involving 40 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution’s case was based solely on the confession of a co-accused, who named the petitioner as an associate, while the liquor was recovered from a motorcycle not owned by the petitioner. The petitioner argued that he had no constructive possession of the liquor and was falsely implicated. The court noted that the recovery was not from the petitioner’s possession and his involvement was alleged only through the co-accused’s statement. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, and conditioned it on Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the petitioner is implicated solely on the basis of a co-accused's statement and lacks constructive possession of the seized liquor
  • Whether the provisions of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act apply to the petitioner in the present circumstances

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • excise law
  • constructive possession
  • false implication
  • Section 30
  • Section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35308 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Rahul Kumar @ Ramu Kumar @ Vishal Kumar S/O Om Saw @ Om Prakash
                 Saw Resident of village- Kabiya, ward no- 25, P.s.- Kabiya, District-
                 Lakhisarai.

                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus

                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Rajnish Chandra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State through virtual mode.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Lakhisarai Excise P.S. Case No.114C2 of

                   2026, F.I.R dated 20.02.2026 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise

                   Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, acting on secret

                   information, the police recovered about 40 liters of illicit

                   liquor from the possession of the co-accused, who during

                   interrogation disclosed the name of the present petitioner as his

                   associate.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35308 of 2026(2) dt.27-05-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case

          merely on the basis of the statement of the apprehended co-

          accused. It is next submitted that the recovery has been made

          from the motorcycle bearing Regd. No. BR53J1365, which

          does not belong to the petitioner and his name has transpired in

          this case on the basis of the confession made by the co-accused

          Sumit Kumar. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no

          concern with the seized liquor. Lastly, it is submitted that the

          petitioner has five criminal antecedents of similar nature and is

          ready to abide by all the terms and conditions as may be

          imposed by this Court while granting the privilege of

          anticipatory bail.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail application.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering that the illicit liquor has not been recovered from

          the constructive possession of the petitioner and his name has

          transpired in this case only on the basis of statement of the co-

          accused, let the petitioner, above named, be released on

          anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          court below within a period of four weeks from today on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35308 of 2026(2) dt.27-05-2026
                                                          3/3




                        two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        learned District & Additional Sessions Judge- VIIth -cum-

                        Exclusive Special Judge, Lakhisarai in connection with

                        Lakhisarai Excise P.S. Case No.114C2 of 2026. subject to the

                        condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.,

                        2023.



                                                                             (Ajit Kumar, J)
rishi/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.