Ranbir Yadav @ Ranvir YadavversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40018 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2025 Thana- NADI THANA District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ranbir Yadav @ Ranvir Yadav S/o Indal Yadav Permanent R/o village -
                  Sattour, P.S.- Darhar, District- Saharsa, at present R/o Village - Rangelipur,
                  Baltharwa, P.S - Nadi, District - Darbhanga..
           2.    Kamlesh Yadav S/o Mahendra Yadav @ Maheshwar Yadav Permanent R/o
                 village - Sattour, P.S.- Darhar, District- Saharsa, at present R/o Village -
                 Rangelipur, Baltharwa, P.S - Nadi, District - Darbhanga
           3.    Kundan Yadav @ Kundan Kumar Yadav S/o Manohar Yadav Permanent R/o
                 village - Sattour, P.S.- Darhar, District- Saharsa, at present R/o Village -
                 Rangelipur, Baltharwa, P.S - Nadi, District - Darbhanga..
           4.    Rajnish Yadav @ Rajnish Kumar S/o Kamleshwar Yadav @ Kamo Yadav
                 Permanent R/o village - Sattour, P.S.- Darhar, District- Saharsa, at present
                 R/o Village - Rangelipur, Baltharwa, P.S - Nadi, District - Darbhanga..

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Amarnath Jha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Rabindra Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-07-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                             2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                   arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail

                   application with respect to petitioner no. 2 (Kamlesh Yadav).

                             3.    Permission is accorded.

                             4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no. 2 ( Kamlesh

                   Yadav).
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40018 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                            2/3




                   5.     The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

          registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2),

          115(2), 109, 303(2) 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

          Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                   6.     Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioner no. 1 is a person with clean antecedent and petitioner

          nos. 3 and 4 have antecedent of one case and the informant

          alleges that four named women accused were cutting wood from

          his land, on objection, they assaulted and snatched her gold

          chain, further on 10-12-2025, the aforesaid four accused abused

          her in presence of her co-villager Dharmendar Paswan, further

          Indal, Rajnish, Ranvir, Kamlesh and Kundan assaulted Vinod by

          lathi, on account of assault by Indal, victim Vinod suffered

          injury on head and he was taken to hospital, further on 11-12-

          2025, Ranjit along with aforesaid named accused fired and fled.

                   7.     Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case on

          account of dispute relating to land. It is next submitted that

          Indal is not a petitioner in the instant case and as far as

          petitioners are concerned, the allegations against them are

          general and omnibus in nature.

                   8.     Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40018 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                                          3/3




                        anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                                 9.     Considering the submissions made by the learned

                        counsel for the petitioners, the petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 above-

                        named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period

                        of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on

                        furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                        each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                        of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor

                        court in connection with Nadi P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025, subject

                        to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the

                        BNSS.



                                                  (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T