Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Munarika Mahto @ Mundrika MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions, under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S 2023.

Summary

Munarika Mahto petitioned the Patna High Court for bail in a case (Udwantnagar PS Case No. 498 of 2025) where he is accused, along with others, of assaulting an informant and his family, violating Sections 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S 2023. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, stating the dispute stemmed from a land issue between agnate families and that the injuries were simple. He asserted he had no prior criminal record and had not previously applied for anticipatory or regular bail. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the nature of the injury, the existence of a counter‑case, and the petitioner’s clean record, the court granted bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within eight weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious charges under Sections 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S 2023.
  • Whether the nature of the alleged injury (simple) and the existence of a land‑dispute counter‑case justify granting bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of prior criminal antecedents and the fact that he had not previously applied for bail affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 482
  • simple injury
  • land dispute
  • anticipatory bail
  • regular bail
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4459 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-498 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Munarika Mahto @ Mundrika Mahto Son of Ram Ishwar Mahto Resident of
                 Village -South Akawna PS- Udwantnagar, Dist- Bhojpur

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr. Anant Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest,

                   in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 498 of 2025,

                   dated 06.10.2025, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S,

                   2023.

                                 3. As per allegation, all the accused persons including

                   the petitioner came to the house of the informant and assaulted

                   him and his family members causing injury to the informant and

                   his wife.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that as a matter of fact both the sides
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4459 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          are agnates and on account of some land dispute, altercation

          took place in which both sides got injury leading to filing of

          case and counter case. He further submits that the injury alleged

          caused by the petitioner’s side is simple in nature.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the

          bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

                       7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       8. Considering the case and counter case between the

          parties and nature of injury is simple, this petition is allowed,

          directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in

          the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within

          a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a

          copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.

          10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in

          connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 498 of 2025,

          subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of

          the B.N.S.S 2023, and on the following conditions:
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4459 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                                      (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                         below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned

                         court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after

                         hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has

                         concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the

                         same.

                                      (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                         below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                         learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                  (Jitendra Kumar, J)
shoaib/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.