Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amar ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC.

Summary

The petitioner, Amar Chaudhari, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the seized liquor, and was implicated by a watchman without proper investigation. The State opposed the bail, citing the petitioner’s antecedent of six prior cases, five of which were under the Excise Act. The Court, after considering the submissions, directed the petitioner to be released on provisional anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000 with two sureties, and imposed conditions including verification of his criminal antecedent. The order also required the petitioner to deposit Rs.10,000 with the Advocates’ Association, and stipulated that if more than six antecedent cases are found, the bail would not be confirmed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 CrPC for an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s criminal antecedent of six cases affects the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Excise Act
  • bail conditions
  • criminal antecedent
  • provisional bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5652 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2025 Thana- R S P.S. District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Amar Chaudhari Son of Panchlal Choudhary @ Panchal Chaudhari Resident
                 of village- Rajokhar Majkuri, Ward no. 04 Ps -R.S. Dist- Araria

                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

                   arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

                   Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner has antecedent of six cases out of which five cases

                   are under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 50

                   litres of liquor from a motorcycle.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was

                   recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of

                   the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated at the instance

                   of Chaukidar, but then, it is submitted that police in majority of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5652 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026
                                            2/3




          cases implicating innocent persons either at the behest of

          Chaukidar, local person, secret information and confessional

          statement in a mechanical manner without holding proper

          investigation.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on

          provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the

          sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial

          Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection

          with R.S. P. S. Case No.214 of 2025, subject to the conditions

          laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

                       7. The application stands allowed.

                       8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after

          accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify

          the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is

          found that petitioner has antecedent of more than six cases, then

          it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5652 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                         obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed his antecedent before

                         this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail

                         order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found

                         that petitioner has antecedent of six cases only, in that event, the

                         provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

                                      9. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on

                         behalf of the petitioner based on instruction submits that

                         petitioner undertakes to deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- with

                         Advocates’ Association, Patna High Court, Patna within a

                         period of two weeks from today.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.