Patna High Court
Md. EmtiyazversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Holding
The petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail subject to bond, sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bihar Code of Criminal Procedure.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Emtiyaz, sought pre‑arrest bail in a dowry‑related case (Naugachia Mahila P.S. Case No. 28/2025) alleging offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 126(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed innocence, a clean antecedent, and that the dispute was a marital issue best resolved outside court. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after reviewing the FIR and noting the allegations were not against society at large, found a prima facie case for bail and ordered his release on pre‑arrest bail subject to a bond and sureties, with conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bihar Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court also directed verification of any other criminal antecedents and referred the matter for mediation under the Mediation Act, 2023. Consequently, the petitioner was granted pre‑arrest bail pending further verification.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail in a dowry‑related offence case.
- Whether Section 482(2) of the Bihar Code of Criminal Procedure permits the grant of such bail.
- Whether the petitioner’s alleged conduct warrants denial of bail on grounds of societal interest.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Penal Code (BNS) — s. 115(2), 126(2), 3(5), 352, 85
- Dowry Prohibition Act — s. 3, 4
- Mediation Act, 2023
Subjects
- pre‑arrest bail
- dowry prohibition
- domestic violence
- criminal procedure
- mediation
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.574 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Md. Emtiyaz Son of Md.Abdul Rajak Resident of Village- Habibpur, P.S.-
Habibpur, District- Bhagalpur, At present Lalmatiya near Kabirpur Jain
Mandir, P.S.- Nath Nagar, District- Bhagalpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Jinat Daughter of Mahmood Nafak Resident Of Village - Tetri, Ward no. 11,
Ps- Naugachia, Dist- Bhagalpur, Wife of Md. imteyaz, Resident of village-
Kabirpur near Lalmatiya jain Mandir, Ps- Nath Nagar, Dist- Bhagalpur
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ojha, Advocate
Mr. Ved Prakash Chandan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 02-04-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ojha along with Mr. Ved
Prakash Chandan, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and Mr. Satyendra Prasad, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection
with Naugachia Mahila P.S. Case No. 28/2025 registered for the
offence(s) punishable under Sections 85,115(2),126(2),352 and
3(5) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. The allegation is of subjecting the informant –
opposite party no.2 to various sorts of torture due to non-
fulfillment of the demand of the dowry.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.574 of 2026(3) dt.02-04-2026
2/3
petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely
been implicated in the present case, being the husband of O.P.
No.2/informant. Learned counsel further submitted that
marriage is a sacred ceremony but little matrimonial skirmish
suddenly erupts into hatred and the parties ponder to reconcile
their dispute outside the court. Petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the
prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on
behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation
made in the FIR and also the fact that the allegation made
against the petitioner is not against the society, I am of the
opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be
released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be
released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender
before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks
from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Naugachia, District,
Bhagalpur / Concerned Court in connection with Naugachia
(Mahila) P.S. Case No. 28/2025, subject to the conditions as laid
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.574 of 2026(3) dt.02-04-2026
3/3
down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the
criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the
petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been
stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will
automatically lose its force.
9. The learned District Court is directed to take
necessary steps to refer the matter for mediation under the
provision of Mediation Act, 2023 before the learned
Mediator of the District Mediation Center by fixing a date
for appearance of the parties to give effect to “Mediation for
the Nation 2.0”, so that the parties, who are husband and
wife, may settle their dispute amicably and lead a happy
married life.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/-
U T
Checking your session…