Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Birendra Yadav @ Virendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners subject to a bail bond, sureties and conditions of cooperation.

Summary

The petitioners, Birendra Yadav and Ashok Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. 2023 relating to assault. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners entered the informant’s house, used abusive language and inflicted injuries, with one alleged to have used a knife. The petitioners contended that the injury report showed only simple injuries caused by a blunt object and that the dispute stemmed from a land conflict, rendering the grievous‑hurt charge untenable. The court noted the lack of criminal antecedents and the nature of the injuries, and, considering the background dispute, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond, sureties and cooperation with the investigation. The order was made under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the circumstances of the case

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • land dispute
  • simple injury
  • criminal antecedents
  • Section 438
  • Section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57807 of 2025
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2025 Thana- KOPA District- Saran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Birendra Yadav @ Virendra Yadav S/O Late Wakil Yadav R/O Vill-
                  Bhatwaliya, P.S- Kopa, Dist- Saran- 841214
           2.    Ashok Yadav @ Ashok Kumar Yadav S/O Late Wakil Yadav R/O Vill-
                 Bhatwaliya, P.S- Kopa, Dist- Saran- 841214

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, A.P.P
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   21-01-2026                            Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P for the State.

                                    2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 329(3), 352,

                   74, 76 r/w Section 3(5) of B.N.S. 2023.

                                  3. As per the prosecution case, accused persons by

                   entering into the house of the informant indulged in abuses and

                   assault causing injuries.

                                    4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   so far as the petitioners are concerned there is an allegation on

                   petitioner no.1 of having assaulted with knife on left hand and

                   neck of the informant while the petitioner no. 2 assaulted with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57807 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026
                                            2/3




          fists and legs. However, the injury report which is available in

          the case diary would indicate that the injuries sustained by the

          informant are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt

          substance. In the background, there is a land dispute and

          litigation between the parties and during the course of

          investigation, Sections 74 and 76 of the B.N.S has not been

          found to be true by the investigating agency. Learned counsel

          has also submitted that the present case is not one under Section

          109 B.N.S. but of having caused grievous hurt under Section

          118 (1) of the B.N.S which is also not made out in view of the

          simple injury.

                        5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by

          learned A. P.P. for the State

                          6. Taking into consideration the facts and

          circumstances and also considering the dispute between the

          parties and the nature of the injury, let the petitioners, having no

          criminal antecedents, in the event of their arrest or surrender

          before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks,

          be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Kopa P.S.

          Case No. 154 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57807 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026
                                                         3/3




                       case is pending subject to the condition laid down under Section

                       438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the

                       B.N.S.S, 2023, subject to the conditions that the petitioner

                       would cooperate in the investigation.



                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
vashudha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.