Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dilkush Yadav @ Krishnanand Yadav @ Krishna Nandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Summary

The petitioner, Dilkush Yadav, was implicated in an FIR alleging kidnapping of a minor girl, with charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The victim, however, gave a statement under Section 180 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita that she had voluntarily eloped with the petitioner. The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent, while the State opposed the relief. The court considered the victim's voluntary statement and the lack of incriminating evidence against the petitioner. It granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within eight weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in view of the victim's voluntary statement under Section 180 BNSS
  • Whether the allegations under the listed sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita constitute a ground to deny bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • kidnapping
  • victim statement
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.610 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2025 Thana- SAHARGHAT District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Dilkush Yadav @ Krishnanand Yadav @ Krishna Nandan Kumar S/o-
                 Ramnath Yadav Resident of Village- Meghban, P.S.- Benipatti, Dist-
                 Madhubani

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Rabindra Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-02-2026                   Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 126, 115(2), 76, 137(2),

                   87, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita.

                                3. As per F.I.R., this petitioner kidnapped minor

                   daughter of the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is

                   innocent and has committed no offence. During investigation,

                   victim was recovered and in her statement, recorded under

                   Section 180 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita she denied

                   the prosecution case and has categorically stated that she eloped
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.610 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026
                                                          2/2




                        with this petitioner on her own accord. Petitioner claims clean

                        antecedent.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                        the bail application.

                                     6. Considering statement of the victim recorded under

                        Section 180 BNSS, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is

                        ordered that the above named petitioner in the event of his

                        arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight

                        weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond

                        of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

                        amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,

                        Benipatti at Madhubani in connection with Shaharghat P. S.

                        Case No. 34 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under

                        Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.