Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sipahi Mahto @ Police MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Sipahi Mahto was arrested in connection with a raid that recovered 20 litres of illicit liquor and alleged assault on police officers while freeing a co‑accused. He is charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (147,148,149,224,225,341,323,353,307,332,333,504,506) and sections 30(a) and 45 of the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he has no criminal antecedents, nothing was found in his possession, and no specific overt act was attributed to him, contending that he has been falsely implicated. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The Court, noting the filing of the charge‑sheet, the petitioner’s custody since 13‑10‑2025, and that co‑accused had already been granted bail, decided to grant bail on the condition of a Rs.15,000 bond with two sureties each. The order releases the petitioner pending trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the IPC and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Excise Act
  • false implication
  • police raid
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6314 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2024 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Sipahi Mahto @ Police Mahto S/o Balmiki Mahto R/o Village - Madanpur
                 Bintoli, P.S.- Avtarnagar, District - Saran
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Bhawana Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Ms.Gulnar Begum, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seek bail in connection with

                   Awtarnagar P.S. Case No. 65 of 2024 instituted for the offence

                   under Sections 147, 148, 149, 224, 225, 341, 323, 353, 307, 332,

                   333, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) & 45

                   of the Excise Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, on secret information, a raid

                   was conducted in which 20 liters illicit liquor was recovered from

                   the house of co-accused, Suresh Mahto and he was apprehended. It

                   is further alleged that when the police proceeded with co-accused,

                   Suresh Mahto and seized the liquor the petitioners along with

                   other FIR named accused persons, attacked the police party and

                   forcibly got released co-accused Suresh Mahto from police

                   custody.

                                4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6314 of 2026(2) dt.30-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     the petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2025. Petitioner bears no

                     criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of

                     the bail application.

                                  5. It has been further submitted that petitioner has been

                     falsely implicated in the present case. Nothing has been recovered

                     from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No specific

                     accusation of overt act has been alleged against the petitioner.

                     Moreover, charge sheet has already been submitted. Other co-

                     accused have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated

                     11.12.2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 80862 of 2025.

                                  6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

                                  7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

                     the case, period of custody of the petitioners, charge sheet being

                     submitted and claim based on parity, this Court is inclined to grant

                     bail to the petitioners.

                                  8. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteeen Thousand) each with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Awtarnagar P.S. Case

                     No. 65 of 2024.


                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.