Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Baidya Nath Mishra @ Bukku MishraversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted because the informant withdrew the complaint, leaving no prima facie case against the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Ashutosh Kumar and Sarita Sangam, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that they had abducted and assaulted a 10‑year‑old boy from the informant’s family and committed various offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The petitioners contended that the boy was taken to Hyderabad at the informant’s request, was treated like a family member, and that the informant later withdrew his complaint, filing an affidavit to that effect. The opposite party did not dispute the informant’s withdrawal. The court examined whether the withdrawal negated the prima facie case and whether anticipatory bail could be granted under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Finding no substantive evidence and noting the informant’s lack of interest in prosecution, the court allowed the anticipatory bail with conditions. The order directed the petitioners to appear before the lower court within eight weeks and to furnish bail bonds and sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the complainant has withdrawn the complaint and filed an affidavit indicating no desire to pursue the case.
  • Whether the allegations under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and POCSO Act constitute a prima facie case justifying denial of bail.
  • Whether Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita empowers the court to grant anticipatory bail in the present circumstances.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of complaint
  • child protection
  • sexual offences
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 482
  • POCSO
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78182 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2025 Thana- CHORAUT District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ashutosh Kumar @ Ashutosh Chaudhary S/o Shyam Sunder Chaudhari R/o
                  510, Tower 5, NCC Urban One Manchirevula, Narsingi, PS- Narsingi, Distt-
                  K.V, Rangareddy, Telangana
           2.    Sarita Sangam @ Anshu Kumari W/o Ashutosh Kumar @ Ashutosh
                 Chaudhary R/O vill-Bari Behata Ward no.-6, P.S. - Choraut, Dist.-
                 Sitamarhi. R/o 510, Tower 5, NCC Urban One, Manchirevula, Narisingi,
                 P.S.- Narsingi, Distt.- K.V. Rangareddy, Telangana

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Baijnath Mukhiya S/o Late Ramjatan Mukhiya R/o vill - Choraut Uttari,
                 ward no. 2, P.S.- Choraut, Distt.- Sitamarhi

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                                                        with
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 66954 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2025 Thana- CHORAUT District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Baidya Nath Mishra @ Bukku Mishra S/o Late Saryu Nandan Mishra R/o
                 Village - Choraut Uttari, Ward No.- 02, P.S - Choraut, District - Sitamarhi

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Baijnath Mukhiya S/o Late Ramjatan Mukhiya R/o Village - Choraut Uttari,
                 Ward No.- 02, P.S - Choraut, District - Sitamarhi

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 78182 of 2025)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Rina Sinha, A.P.P.
                 For the O.P. No. 2       : Mr. Dinesh Jha, Advocate
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 66954 of 2025)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Pushpa Sinha, A.P.P.
                 For the O.P. No. 2       : Mr. Dinesh Jha, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   31-03-2026                 Both the aforementioned cases are being disposed of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78182 of 2025(6) dt.31-03-2026
                                            2/5




          by a common order.

                       2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, opposite

          party no. 2 and the State.

                       3. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for

          the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1),

          118(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and

          Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

          Act.

                       4. As per F.I.R., on 04.04.2025, these petitioners came

          at the residence of informant and took away his 10 year old son

          to their village, where they assaulted and threatened him and

          took him to Hyderabad. After one month, on repeated requests

          by the informant, petitioner, namely, Baidya Nath Mishra

          returned his son to the informant. Informant alleges that these

          petitioners committed cruelty upon him. They burnt his private

          part and used to keep his hands and legs tied and gave him toilet

          water to drink.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. As per

          F.I.R., though informant came to know about the incidents from

          his son on 05.05.2025 but written report for the same was

          lodged on 11.05.2025 i.e., after inordinate delay of six days
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78182 of 2025(6) dt.31-03-2026
                                            3/5




          without any plausible explanation. As a matter of fact,

          petitioners, namely, Ashutosh Kumar and Sarita Sangam live in

          Hyderabad with their two children and when they went to the

          ancestral village of Sarita Sangam, informant and his wife,

          being very poor, requested them to take their son with them to

          Hyderabad so that he can get a good life and upon their request,

          petitioners, namely, Ashutosh Kumar and Sarita Sangam took

          their son with them to Hyderabad and used to treat him like their

          own child. They even took him to Malikarjuna Swamy Temple

          with them for darshan on 16.03.2025, which is evident from the

          ticket issued by the temple (Annexure-P/2). It is further

          submitted that in fact, son of the informant used to sexually

          abuse/assault their four year old daughter and when Sarita

          Sangam came to know about the same, she slapped the son of

          informant and isolated him in a room and told about the incident

          to the informant. Ultimately, the son of informant was sent back

          from Hyderabad with petitioner, namely, Baidya Nath Mishra.

          Thereafter, petitioner, namely, Ashutosh Kumar filed a petition

          before the Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad, Telangana on

          08.05.2025 against the son of informant and immediately

          thereafter, informant filed a petition before the Court of learned

          District & Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78182 of 2025(6) dt.31-03-2026
                                            4/5




          POCSO, Sitamarhi on 06.06.2025 to the effect that Gotiya of

          petitioner, namely, Baidya Nath Mishra had taken his signature

          on a typed petition and on the basis of the same present case has

          been instituted, but now, after coming to know about the real

          fact, informant is not interested in pursuing the case any furhter,

          an affidavit was also filed along with the petition on 06.06.2025

          in this regard (Annexure-P/4). Petitioners            claim clean

          antecedent.

                       6. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does

          not dispute the contention made on behalf of the petitioners

          regarding the fact that informant does not want to pursue the

          case any further.

                       7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that

          let the above named petitioners in the event of their

          arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight

          weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond

          of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Additional

          Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Sitamarhi in

          connection with PTN 1554/2025 arising out of Choraut P. S.

          Case No. 69 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78182 of 2025(6) dt.31-03-2026
                                                          5/5




                        Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

                        2023.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.