Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Akash Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to the conditions stipulated under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioner, Akash Kumar Sah, was implicated in a case registered under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for a robbery‑and‑threat incident that occurred on 31 May 2025. The petitioner contends that he is innocent, asserting that his name appears only in a confessional statement of a co‑accused and that no incriminating material was recovered from his possession or residence. He also highlighted a three‑day delay in filing the FIR and the lack of any criminal antecedents. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court, after considering the circumstances, granted bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, including a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and compliance with procedural safeguards.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the delay in lodging the FIR and the sole reliance on a co‑accused’s confession justify release on bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Section 310(2) BNSS
  • Section 482(2) BNSS
  • criminal procedure
  • delay in FIR
  • confessional statement
  • co‑accused

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6883 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2025 Thana- BISHANPUR District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Akash Kumar Sah S/o- Devendra Kumar Sah @ Devendra Sah R/o Village-
                 Taralahi Ps-Bahadurpur Dist- Darbhanga

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Baidyanath Prasad
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                                Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

                   connection with Bisanpur P.S. Case No.84 of 2025, dated

                   02.06.2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections

                   310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                   3. The informant alleged that on 31.05.2025, while

                   travelling with his family from Hajipur to Darbhanga

                   (Bakarganj) in a booked tempo, 5–10 unknown armed persons

                   intercepted the vehicle near Bhasaul Chowk. They took the

                   tempo into a forest, searched their luggage, and threatened to

                   kill them unless money was paid. The informant transferred

                   money via mobile, after which the miscreants snatched

                   jewellery worth about Rs.2.5 lakhs from his sister and wife and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6883 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          also took a trolley bag containing Rs.20,000 in cash.

                          4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

          present case. He further submits that the name of the petitioner

          has surfaced solely on the basis of the confessional statement

          made by the co-accused, Sundar Yadav, while nothing

          incriminating has been recovered either from the conscious

          possession of the petitioner or from his house, which was

          searched in his absence. There is a delay of three days in

          lodging the FIR, for which no explanation has been offered, and

          the petitioner has been implicated at the instance of the

          informant, who is a liquor trader. Lastly, it is submitted that the

          petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

                          5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State

          has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                          6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond

          of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-VIIth,

          Darbhanga/Successor Court in connection with Bisanpur P.S.
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6883 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                         Case No.84 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under

                         Section 482(2) of the BNSS as well as the following conditions:

                                      (i) One of the bailors should be the family

                         member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official

                         document to show his/her bona fide;

                                      (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every

                         date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two

                         consecutive       dates     without      plausible   reason   will   entail

                         cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                      (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or

                         promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                         failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                         cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                      (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any

                         criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                         to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.



                                                       (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.