Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Syed Shahnawaz WajeehversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Praveen Kumar @ Pinda, was arrested in connection with a robbery in which three unknown assailants allegedly intercepted two motorcyclists and stole cash and mobile phones. He was charged under section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner argued that he was innocent, that no incriminating articles were recovered from his possession, and that the investigation was complete with a chargesheet already filed. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent. The court, considering the pending chargesheet, the period of custody since 09‑06‑2025, and the bail bond conditions, ordered that bail be granted on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, pending trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted to an accused under section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita who has a prior criminal antecedent and for whom a chargesheet has already been filed
  • Whether the absence of recovered incriminating articles from the accused’s possession warrants bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • section 309(4)
  • criminal antecedent
  • chargesheet
  • Patna High Court
  • robbery
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75056 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2025 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Praveen Kumar @ Pinda S/O Sadhu Ray R/O Village- Kailachak, P.S.-
                 Bidhupur, District- Vaishali
                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar Patna                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mrs. Rupa Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   19-03-2026                         Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Bidupur P.S. Case No.386 of 2025, dated 07.06.2025 registered

                   for the offence punishable u/s 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita.

                                   3. As per the FIR, when the informant and his

                   colleague were riding on their respective motorcycles after

                   making collection of Rs.74,500/- and Rs.88,460 respectively,

                   they were intercepted by three unknown criminals and after

                   putting them on gun point took the money and mobile phones

                   from them.

                                   4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the

                   petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has not

                   committed any offence as alleged in the FIR.                         He further

                   submits that there is no recovery of incriminating articles from

                   the possession of the petitioner and the articles, which is said to
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75056 of 2025(5) dt.19-03-2026
                                                           2/2




                         have form part of the seizure list is not connected with the

                         petitioner. He further submits that the investigation is complete

                         and chargesheet has also been submitted in this case. The

                         petitioner has one criminal antecedent and has been in judicial

                         custody since 09.06.2025.

                                         5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State

                         has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner by submitting

                         that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent.

                                         6. Considering the period of custody and that the

                         chargesheet has already been submitted, let the above named

                         petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

                         10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                         amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where

                         the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with

                         Bidupur P.S. Case No.386 of 2025.



                                                                       (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.