Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Budhani Devi @ Rani DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioners, Budhani Devi and Chandani Kumari, were arrested in connection with a murder case (Jandaha PS Case No.219 of 2025) alleging they poisoned the informant's son and concealed the body. They sought bail, claiming innocence, lack of specific allegations, and that the cause of death was still unknown as the viscera report was pending. The State opposed the bail. The court noted that the allegations were not specific, the trial had already commenced, and bail would enable the petitioners to prepare their defence. Consequently, the court ordered bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties. The bail was granted subject to compliance with the conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a murder case where the trial has commenced and the allegations are not specific.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • poison
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • trial commencement
  • specific allegations

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75967 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2025 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
           1.     Budhani Devi @ Rani Devi W/o- Bechan Sahani R/v- Kabai Barela Ps-
                  Jandaha Mahisaur Dist- Vaishali
           2.     Chandani Kumari D/o- Bechan Sahani R/v- Kabai Barela Ps- Jandaha
                  Mahisaur Dist- Vaishali
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mrs.Suruchi Anand
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   19-03-2026                       Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioners are seeking for bail in connection

                   with Jandaha P.S. Case No.219 of 2025, dated 24.05.2025

                   registered for the offence punishable u/s 123, 103, 238 and 3(5) of

                   the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                   3. As per the FIR, the petitioners are alleged to have

                   killed the informant’s son by administering poison and thereafter

                   concealed the body in order to save themselves.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence as

                   alleged in the FIR. Petitioner No. 1 is the mother-in-law of the

                   deceased and Petitioner No. 2 is the wife of the deceased. It is

                   further submitted that the dead body of the deceased is said to have

                   been recovered on the basis of the confessional statement of
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75967 of 2025(6) dt.19-03-2026
                                                           2/2




                         Petitioner No. 1. It is also submitted that the allegation against the

                         deceased was killed by administering poison in food, however,

                         such allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next

                         submitted that the investigation is complete, the charge-sheet has

                         already been filed, and the trial has commenced. It is further

                         submitted that the allegation of administering poison has not

                         surfaced, as the opinion with regard to the viscera report is reserved

                         and the cause of death remains unknown. The petitioners have no

                         criminal antecedents and are in judicial custody since 25.05.2025.

                                         5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

                         opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                         6. Considering that the allegations are not specific and

                         trial has commenced and, in order to set up their defence, let the

                         above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                         bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties

                         of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court

                         below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection

                         with Jandaha P.S. Case No.219 of 2025.



                                                                   (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.