Patna High Court
SYED KAMRAN HAIDER NABI @ KAMRAN HAIDAR NABIversusState Of Bihar and Anr
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of as infructuous.
Summary
Petitioner Syed Kamran Haider Nabi filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 29-07-2016 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, which had framed charges against him under IPC Sections 323, 504, 406 and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner argued that the proceedings had become infructuous and should be disposed of. The State of Bihar raised no objection to the petitioner's prayer. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court held that the application was infructuous and disposed of it accordingly, without ordering any further action on the charges.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the charge sheet is maintainable when the case is alleged to be infructuous
- Whether the proceedings are indeed infructuous warranting disposal of the application
Legislation cited
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 482
- Indian Penal Code — s. 323, 406, 504
- Negotiable Instruments Act — s. 138
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure
- Section 482
- Quash Order
- Infructuous Proceedings
- Charge Framing
- IPC
- Negotiable Instruments Act
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7601 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-409 Year-2014 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE
District- Samastipur
======================================================
Syed Kamran Haider Nabi @ Kamran Haidar Nabi Son of Syed Sohaibun
Nabi, Resident of Mohalla- Dharmpur, Ward No. 2, P.O.P.S.- Samastipur,
District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Naukhej Alam, Son of Mansoor Alam, Resident of Mohalla- Dharmpur,
Ward No. 2, P.O.P.S.- Samastipur, District- Samastipur.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kamal, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
6 14-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed
under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated
29.07.2016 passed by learned C.J.M., Samastipur in connection
with Complaint Case No.409 of 2014 by which charge has been
framed against the petitioner under Sections 323, 504, 406 of
the I.P.C. and Section 138 of the N.I. Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this
case may be disposed of as it has become infructuous.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this
prayer of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7601 of 2017(6) dt.14-05-2026
2/2
5. Considering the submissions of learned counsels
for the parties, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed
of as it has become infructuous.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-Utkarsh/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.