Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Atul Anjan @ PhuloversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to a cash bond, sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Atul Anjan, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault and theft of a gold chain. He claimed innocence, asserted that the incident was a simple hurt case, and stated he had no prior criminal record or earlier bail applications. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court examined the nature of the charges, the petitioner’s claim of no antecedents, and the absence of a prior bail petition, and decided to grant bail with a cash bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023. The order also provided for cancellation of bail if the petitioner concealed any criminal antecedents or misrepresented facts about a prior bail petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner pending trial for offences under Sections 126, 115, 109, 303, 352 and 3 of the B.N.S., 2023.
  • Whether the alleged assault and theft constitute a case of simple hurt, affecting bail eligibility.
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of no criminal antecedents and no prior bail application is credible.
  • Whether Section 109 of the B.N.S., 2023 is applicable to the facts.
  • Whether the conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023 justify granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal antecedents
  • simple hurt
  • assault
  • theft
  • Section 126
  • Section 115
  • Section 109
  • Section 303
  • Section 352
  • Section 3
  • Section 482
  • B.N.S. 2023
  • B.N.S.S. 2023

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76818 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2025 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District-
                                                        Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Atul Anjan @ Phulo S/O Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Singh Resident of
                 Village- Ratanpur, P.S.- Ratanpur, District- Begusarai

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Mukul Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State          :        Mr. Anish Chandra, APP
                 For the Informant      :        Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   24-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest,

                   in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 261 of

                   2025, dated 27.07.2025, registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of

                   B.N.S., 2023.

                                 3. As per allegation, the petitioner and other co-

                   accused assaulted the son of the informant and took away a

                   golden chain worth Rs. 3,50,000/-.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that the occurrence took place on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76818 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                            2/3




          account of previous land dispute and Section 109 is not

          applicable. It is a case of simple hurt because as per the injury

          report, the alleged injury is simple in nature caused by hard and

          blunt substance.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the

          bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

                       7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named,

          to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the

          date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his

          furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection

          with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 261 of 2025, subject to

          the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the

          B.N.S.S 2023, and on the following conditions:
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76818 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                                      (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                         below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned

                         court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after

                         hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has

                         concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the

                         same.

                                      (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                         below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                         learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                      (Jitendra Kumar, J)
shoaib/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.