Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Karan Kumar @ Karan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023.

Summary

Karan Kumar (Karan Yadav) was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family with a sword and knife. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated and that the FIR was a retaliatory counter‑complaint to an earlier case in which his side was sexually assaulted. He asserted no prior criminal record and argued that he had not previously applied for anticipatory or regular bail. The State opposed the bail application, citing the seriousness of the offences. The High Court, considering the circumstances, granted bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023, including cancellation of bail if criminal antecedents are later discovered.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the B.N.S. 2023
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of false implication and lack of prior criminal antecedents warrant bail

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S., 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 126(2), 191(1), 191(2), 191(3), 303(2), 351(2), 352, 74
  • B.N.S.S., 2023 — s. 482(2)

Subjects

  • bail
  • false implication
  • assault
  • counter FIR
  • criminal antecedents
  • Section 482
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77336 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2025 Thana- AKBARPUR District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Karan Kumar @ Karan Yadav, S/o Fulchand Yadav, Resident of Village-
                 Lohsinghna, P.S.- Akbarpur, District- Nawada.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :        Mr. Rajeev Nayan, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   24-02-2026                          Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest,

                   in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No.182 of 2025,

                   dated.13.04.2025, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 191(1), 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2),

                   109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 74, of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. As per allegation, the Petitioner and other co-

                   accused came to the house of the Informant and started

                   assaulting the Informant and his family members using talwar

                   and khanti causing injury on their persons.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that as a matter of fact, the present FIR
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77336 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026
                                            2/3




          is a counterblast of Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025 lodged

          on account of outraging the modesty of two ladies of the

          Petitioner’s side. He further submits that on account of this

          sexual assault committed against the lady members of the

          Petitioner’s side, altercation took place, in which both the sides

          got injury. He further brings to the notice of this Court that the

          FIR lodged by the Petitioner’s side was on the same day prior to

          the present FIR in which they are seeking bail. Moreover, the

          present case has been lodged by the Informant side only to save

          their skin from the offence of sexual assault committed by them

          against the lady members of the Petitioner’s side.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the

          bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

                       7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named,

          to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77336 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his

                      furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten

                      Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection

                      with Akbarpur P.S. Case No.182 of 2025, subject to the

                      conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S

                      2023, and on the following conditions:

                                   (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                      below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned

                      court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after

                      hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has

                      concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the

                      same.

                                   (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                      below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                      learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                       (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
Chandan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.