Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shubham Kumar Singh @ Shubham SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail must be granted as the petitioner was not found in possession of the contraband and procedural requirements under Section 103 were not satisfied.

Summary

Shubham Kumar Singh was arrested in Sakri Police Station case No.76 of 2024 for alleged offences under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, after 953.640 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. The petitioner contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, the motorcycle did not belong to him, and no incriminating material was found on his person; his name was allegedly supplied by a local chowkidar. He had been in custody since 29‑10‑2025 and possessed four prior criminal antecedents, while the prosecution had not complied with Section 103 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. Considering the lack of direct evidence, the procedural lapse, and the length of custody, the Court granted bail subject to a cash bond of Rs.15,000, two sureties, and conditions of appearance, thereby releasing the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the nature of the offences and his prior criminal antecedents.
  • Whether non‑compliance with Section 103 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 bars the grant of bail.
  • Whether the absence of incriminating material in the petitioner’s possession justifies bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • Indian Penal Code
  • criminal procedure
  • prior antecedents
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2024 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Shubham Kumar Singh @ Shubham Singh S/o Vipin Singh R/o Village -
                 Narpatinagar, P.S - Sakri, District - Madhubani

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                               2. The petitioner seeks bail in Sakri P.S. case No.

                   76 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 272,

                   273, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 36,

                   38(1), 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 953.640

                   liters liquor was recovered from motorcycle.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                   the present case.            No incriminating material has been

                   recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                            2/3




          The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery

          of liquor. It is further submitted that the name of the

          petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by

          local chowkidar. The motorcycle in question does not

          belong to the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since

          29.10.2025 and has got four criminal antecedents. There is

          no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

                      5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                       6.     Considering          the      aforesaid   facts   and

          circumstances of the case and the period of custody

          undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant

          bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sakri P.S.

          case No. 76 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

                       (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member

          of the family of the petitioner.

                       (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance

                     on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty

                     to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Pankaj/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.