Patna High Court
Aditya KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- R P MISHRA
Holding
Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to the stipulated conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, a driver, was arrested in connection with a case (Excise P.S. case No. 4260 of 2025) for alleged possession of 129.6 litres of liquor, alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution argued that the liquor was recovered from the vehicle he was driving, while the petitioner contended that he had no knowledge of the goods and no incriminating material was found in his personal possession. He has been in custody since 20‑11‑2025, has no prior criminal record, and the State failed to comply with Section 103 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. The learned APP opposed bail, but the Court considered the clean antecedent, lack of direct evidence, and procedural lapse. Consequently, the Court granted bail on a bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of family surety, regular appearance, and possible cancellation on default.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the charges under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
- Whether the State’s failure to comply with Section 103 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 warrants bail.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S.S., 2023 — s. 103
Subjects
- bail
- excise
- liquor seizure
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- criminal procedure
- clean antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8011 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4260 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Patna
======================================================
Aditya Kumar S/O Arun Kumar Resident of - Danapur Machhua Toli, Ward
No.3, P.S. - Danapur, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Birendra Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narsingh Tanti, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in Patna Excise P.S.
case No. 4260 of 2025 instituted for the offences under
Sections 30(a) 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and
Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 129.6
liters liquor was recovered from car.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in
the present case. No incriminating material has been
recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8011 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026
2/3
The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery
of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioner is driver
of the vehicle in question and he had no knowledge
regarding nature of goods kept in the vehicle. The petitioner
is in custody since 20.11.2025 and has got no criminal
antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of
B.N.S.S., 2023.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently
opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and
circumstances of the case, clean antecedent and the period
of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is
inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
Court below/concerned Court in connection with Patna
Excise P.S. case No. 4260 of 2025, subject to the following
conditions:
(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member
of the family of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8011 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026
3/3
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every
date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance
on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty
to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Pankaj/-
U T
Checking your session…