Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted pre‑arrest bail to the petitioner, finding no sufficient evidence of his knowledge or participation in the smuggling offence.

Summary

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case where 360 litres of smuggled Nepali liquor were recovered from a vehicle registered in his name. The prosecution alleged violations of Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was unaware of the vehicle's misuse and that the only link to him was a confessional statement by the driver, Navin Kumar. The State opposed bail, but the court noted the lack of direct evidence of the petitioner's knowledge and the reliance on the co‑accused’s confession. Consequently, the court granted pre‑arrest bail subject to a bond and sureties, and directed the petitioner’s transfer to a rehabilitation centre for health reasons.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail despite the recovery of illicit liquor from his vehicle.
  • Whether the confessional statement of the co‑accused suffices to establish the petitioner's knowledge or participation in the offence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • illicit liquor smuggling
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • confessional statement
  • vehicle misuse
  • rehabilitation centre

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8339 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1409 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Rahul Kumar (M) aged about- 25 Yrs, Son of Ram Ishwar Singh, resident of
                 Village - Lauhadiah, Ward no - 07, P.S.- Dumra, District -Sitamarhi

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mrs. Asha Devi, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                           Heard Mr. Devendra Kumar, learned counsel

                   appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. Asha Devi,

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

                   with Sitamarhi Excise P.S. Case No. 1409 of 2025 registered for

                   the offence punishable under Sections 30 (a) and 32 (c) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act as amended up-to-date.

                                3. Allegation is of recovery of 360 litres of Nepali

                   Saufi smuggled liquor from a vehicle bearing Registration No.

                   BR-30P-2200 registered in the name of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated

                   in the present case. The name of the petitioner has surfaced on

                   the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused (driver)
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8339 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                            2/3




          Navin Kumar. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged seized

          liquor nor he is involved in trade or manufacturing of illicit

          liquor in any manner. The petitioner had no knowledge that his

          vehicle is being misused for carrying illicit liquor. Petitioner

          denied his complicity in the alleged offence. On these grounds,

          petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf

          of the parties, as well as, the fact that the name of the petitioner

          has surfaced on the basis of confessional statement made by co-

          accused (driver) Navin Kumar, the petitioner had no knowledge

          that his vehicle is being misused for carrying illicit liquor and

          the State has failed to implement its liquor policy in its true

          spirit, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on

          pre-arrest bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before

          the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from

          today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned District Court where the case is

          pending, in connection with Sitamarhi Excise P.S. Case No.

          1409 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8339 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                          3/3




                        Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

                                     7. The State must ensure that the petitioner is taken to

                        Rehabilitation Centre for proper care of his health and to save

                        young generation of the State of Bihar, who have fallen in

                        trade/consumption of illicit liquor containing Urea, which is

                        injurious to health.

                                     8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

                        Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, as well as, the

                        Superintendent of Police and District Magistrate of the

                        concerned district.

                                     9. The present bail application is disposed of.



                                                  (Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.