Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to petitioners 1 and 2 but denied to petitioner 3.

Summary

The petitioners, three residents of Raghopur Pashchami, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that petitioners 1 and 2 assaulted an informant with an iron rod causing simple injuries, while petitioner 3 assaulted the informant’s brother causing grievous injury. The case involved offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court examined whether anticipatory bail could be granted given the nature of the offences and the severity of injuries, applying the discretion under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. It held that anticipatory bail could be granted to petitioners 1 and 2 but must be refused for petitioner 3 due to the grievous nature of the injury caused. The court ordered bail for petitioners 1 and 2 upon surrender, subject to a bond and sureties, and denied bail to petitioner 3.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the accused under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
  • Whether the severity of injury (simple vs grievous) influences the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • grievous injury
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83899 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2025 Thana- JURAWANPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
           1.     Satish Kumar Son of Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Ray Resident of
                  Village -Raghopur Pashchami PS -Jurawanpur District -Vaishali at Hajipur
           2.    Mukesh Kumar son of Prabhash Rai @ Sukkan Rai Resident of Village
                 -Raghopur Pashchami PS -Jurawanpur District -Vaishali at Hajipur
           3.    Avinash Kumar Rai @ Avinash Rai son of Late. Prakash Chandra Rai @
                 Teman Rai Resident of Village -Raghopur Pashchami PS -Jurawanpur
                 District -Vaishali at Hajipur
           4.    Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Rai son of Late. Prakash Chandra Rai @ Teman Rai
                 Resident of Village -Raghopur Pashchami PS -Jurawanpur District -Vaishali
                 at Hajipur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms. Sudha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P.
                 For the Informant        :       Mr. Ritesh Ranjan, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   17-03-2026                  Pre-arrest bail application with regard to petitioner no.

                   4 has already been withdrawn vide Order no. 2 dated

                   06.01.2026.

                                2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant

                   and the State.

                                3. Petitioner nos. 1 to 3 apprehend arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190,

                   191(1), 191(3), 115(2), 118(2), 126(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 352,

                   351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83899 of 2025(3) dt.17-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   4. As per F.I.R., petitioner nos. 1 and 2 assaulted

                      informant with iron rod and petitioner no. 3 assaulted brother of

                      the informant by means of iron rod. Injuries caused by petitioner

                      nos. 1 & 2 are simple in nature while injury caused by petitioner

                      no. 3 is grievous.

                                   5. In view of the fact that petitioner No. 3 caused

                      grievous injury, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No.

                      3 is refused.

                                   6. However, considering the nature of accusation and

                      injuries, the anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner Nos. 1,

                      2 is allowed and it is ordered that the above named petitioner

                      Nos. 1, 2 in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court

                      below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on

                      bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each

                      with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                      Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with

                      Jurawanpur P. S. Case No. 142 of 2025, subject to condition as

                      laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik

                      Suraksha Sanhita.



                                            (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.