Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Lolu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar.

Summary

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, was implicated in an FIR alleging assault and firing a pistol at the informant and his family. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to village political enmity and that the actual firearm injury was caused by another individual, Vickey Singh. The prosecution had not presented any incriminating material against the petitioner, and a co‑accused (the petitioner's father) had already been granted anticipatory bail by the same court. Relying on the lack of evidence, the petitioner’s clean antecedent, and the precedent of bail to the co‑accused, the court decided to grant anticipatory bail. The bail was conditioned on a bond, sureties, appearance before the trial court, and prohibitions against witness tampering or further offences.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the allegations and evidence.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement constitutes an offence warranting denial of bail.
  • Whether the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023 are appropriate.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • false implication
  • assault
  • firearm offence
  • bail conditions
  • Section 482
  • clean antecedent
  • witness tampering

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83994 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2025 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Kanhaiya Kumar @ Lolu Kumar S/o Ranjeet Singh @ Ranjeet Kumar Singh
                 R/o Village- Nandpur, P.S.- Suryagarha, Distt- Lakhisarai
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Raghwendra Pratap Singh, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                   Heard Mr. Raghwendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

                                2. This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises

                   out of Surajgarha Police Station Case No. 194 of 2025 dated

                   18.06.2025, disclosing the offence under Sections 126(2),

                   329(3), 109(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS lodged by the

                   informant, Sunil Kumar.

                                  3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states

                   that the accused persons including the petitioner herein came

                   and assaulted the informant as also the members of his family. It

                   is further stated that while Sonu Kumar and Raju Kumar caught

                   hold of the hand of his son, Kanhaiya Kumar @ Lolu Kumar

                   (petitioner) is said to have assaulted with the butt of a pistol. On

                   the orders of one Ashok Singh, the petitioner resorted to firing,

                   however, the shot missed. Accordingly, the present FIR.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83994 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/4




                        4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR

          and he has falsely been implicated in this case and on the basis

          of old enmity between the parties due to village politics. He

          further submits that during course investigation, it has come on

          record that the fire arm injury which is sustained by the injured,

          Amresh Kumar was inflicted by one Vickey Singh, who had

          opened fire and this petitioner though, has been implicated in

          this case but there is no allegation of overt-act against him. It

          has next been submitted that similarly placed co-accused person

          who is said to be the father of this petitioner namely, Ranjeet

          Singh @ Ranjeet Kumar Singh has been granted anticipatory

          bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated

          30.08.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 56100 of 2025 (Annexure-P/3) and

          the petitioner has got clean antecedent.

                           5. On the other hand, learned APP by referring to

          the case diary does not dispute the submission of the petitioner.

                           6.    After having heard learned counsel for the

          parties and taking into consideration the fact that nothing

          incriminating against this petitioner has been found during

          course of investigation, allegation of opening fire arm is against

          one Vickey Singh and similarly situated co-accused, as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83994 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            3/4




          mentioned above, has been granted anticipatory bail by a co-

          ordinate Bench of this Court and the petitioner has got no

          criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined to grant the petitioner

          the privilege of anticipatory bail.

                           7.     This application for anticipatory bail is,

          accordingly, allowed.

                           8. Let the petitioner, named above, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks

          from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

          Lakhisarai, in connection with aforesaid Police Station Case

          subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of

          the B.N.S.S. 2023, as well as the following conditions:-

                                                       (i) one of the bailors should
                                          be the family member/relative of the
                                          petitioner(s) who shall provide official
                                          document to show his/her bona fide;
                                                       (ii) the petitioner(s) shall
                                          appear on each and every date before
                                          the Trial Court and failure to do so for
                                          two       consecutive         dates    without
                                          plausible            reason     will    entail
                                          cancellation of his bail bond by the
                                          Trial Court itself;
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83994 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                         4/4




                                                                    (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in
                                                       no way try to induce or promise or
                                                       threat the witnesses or tamper with the
                                                       evidences, failing which the State shall
                                                       be at liberty to take steps for
                                                       cancellation of the bail
                                                                    (iv) the petitioner(s) shall
                                                       desist from committing any criminal
                                                       offence again, failing which the State
                                                       shall be at liberty to take steps for
                                                       cancellation of his bail bonds.




                                                     (Ajit Kumar, J)
    perwez

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.