Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to bond and conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested as the driver of a pick‑up vehicle from which 293.44 litres of liquor were seized, leading to charges under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, that no incriminating material was found in his possession, and that he had no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court considered the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner, his clean antecedents, and the duration of his custody since 17‑10‑2025. Consequently, the Court granted bail on a bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions regarding family surety and regular appearance before the trial court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused driver in a case involving alleged possession of liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • liquor seizure
  • driver
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8549 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2025 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Nitish Kumar Son of Dev Krishna Yadav Resident of village Rahta, P.S.-
                 Kumarkhand, District - Madhepura.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Madan Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   11-02-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                               2. The petitioner seeks bail in Baisi P.S. case No.

                   422 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a),

                   41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 293.440

                   liters liquor was recovered from pick-up vehicle and the

                   petitioner was arrested on spot.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                   the present case.            No incriminating material has been

                   recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8549 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




          The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery

          of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioner is driver

          of the vehicle in question and he had no knowledge

          regarding nature of goods kept in the vehicle. The petitioner

          is in custody since 17.10.2025 and has got no criminal

          antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of

          B.N.S.S., 2023.

                      5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                       6.     Considering          the        aforesaid   facts   and

          circumstances of the case and the period of custody

          undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant

          bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          Court below/concerned Court in connection with Baisi P.S.

          case No. 422 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

                       (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member

          of the family of the petitioner.

                       (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8549 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance

                     on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty

                     to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Pankaj/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.