Patna High Court
Zeba Khatoon @ Aisha ParweenversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Zeba Khatoon, sister of the main accused Aamir Akram, applied for anticipatory bail after her name was implicated in FIR No.57 of 2025 under sections 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S, 2023 concerning a kidnapping case. She argued that the FIR specifically targets Aamir Akram and that her inclusion is merely due to familial relation, with no criminal antecedent and a willingness to cooperate. The State opposed the bail, but the court considered her gender, lack of prior record, and the vague nature of the allegations against her. Relying on Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023, the court ordered that she be released on anticipatory bail if arrested, upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The order is subject to the usual conditions and the case remaining pending in the lower court.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner, merely being the sister of the accused, can be granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.
- Whether the FIR sufficiently implicates the petitioner to deny bail.
- Applicability of Sections 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S, 2023 and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023 in granting anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S., 2023 — s. 3(5), 96
- B.N.S.S., 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 438 CrPC
- Section 482 B.N.S.S
- gender considerations
- FIR
- bail bond
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88145 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya
======================================================
Zeba Khatoon @ Aisha Parween W/O Md. Chand,D/O Salim Akram R/O
Mohalla - Road No.- 3 New Karimganj, P.S- Civil Line, Dist.- Gayaji
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Md. Hamza Kadri S/O Late Syed Sajjad Akhtar R/O Aliganj, Road No.-
1A,P.S- Chandauti, Dist.- Gaya
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shivendra Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
2 15-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Chandauti P.S. Case no.57 of 2025 registered under
sections 96 and 3(5) of B.N.S, 2023.
3. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that the informant’s
daughter was kidnapped by one Aamir Akram, who had
previously also eloped with her.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it
would be apparent from the narration made in the F.I.R itself
that specific allegation is upon accused Aamir Akram, however,
entire family has been implicated on vague allegations of their
complicity. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case
only for the reason that she happens to be the sister of the main
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88145 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
2/2
accused. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and
undertakes to co-operate in investigation/trial.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by
learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and
circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that
petitioner is a female and she has been implicated in the case
only for the reason that she happens to be the sister of the main
accused who had eloped with the victim, it is directed that the
petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender
before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks,
be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Chandauti
P.S. Case no.57 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned where
the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the condition laid
down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
Harsh/-
U
Checking your session…