Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Kumar KamtiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court allowed the anticipatory bail application, subject to bond and surety conditions, under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of a woman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 34, the Dowry Prohibition Act (ss.3,4) and the Bihar Excise Act (s.37). The FIR alleged that the victim’s husband and his relatives assaulted her for non‑payment of dowry, with the husband found intoxicated at the time. The petitioners contended they have clean antecedents, were falsely implicated, and that no dowry‑related complaint had been made in the five‑year marriage. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted anticipatory bail subject to a cash bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, and imposed conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the serious nature of the offences alleged.
  • Whether the petitioners are likely to tamper with evidence, influence witnesses, or abscond if released on bail.
  • Whether Section 482(2) of the BNSS permits the grant of anticipatory bail in this circumstance.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry harassment
  • IPC offences
  • false implication
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91334 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2022 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ram Kumar Kamti S/O Gultain Kamti R/O Village- R.S. Tanka Navtolia,
                  P.S- Bahadurpur, Distt.- Darbhanga.
           2.    Asha Devi W/O Ram Kuamr Kamti R/O Village- R.S. Tanka Navtolia, P.S-
                 Bahadurpur, Distt.- Darbhanga.
           3.    Krishna Kumar Kamti @ Krishna Kamti S/O Ram Kumar Kamti R/O
                 Village- R.S. Tanka Navtolia, P.S- Bahadurpur, Distt.- Darbhanga.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Ram Kamat S/O Late Bindeshwar Kamat R/O Village- Benipatti, P.S-
                 Benipatti, Distt.- madhubani.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Baidyanath Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Section 341, 323,

                   498A, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections

                   3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and under Section 37 of

                   the Bihar Excise Act.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are father-in-

                   law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the victim. It is next
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91334 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                            2/3




          submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the

          FIR, it would manifest that informant alleges that his daughter

          was married to Santosh in the year 2020 and after marriage all

          accused persons started abusing and even assaulted the victim

          for non-fulfillment of dowry demand and on 06.06.2022, he

          received an information that all the accused persons were

          assaulting his daughter accordingly, he reached the place of

          occurrence and found his son-in-law in an intoxicated condition

          and when the informant opposed his act, he was abused.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners next submits

          that petitioners being related to the husband of the victim came

          to be falsely implicated in the instant case. It is also submitted

          that marriage was five years old and in between these five years,

          no case ever came to be instituted alleging demand of dowry

          and torture. It is further submitted that husband of the victim

          was taken in custody and he has been released on regular bail by

          the learned District Court.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the

          event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91334 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      within a period of six weeks from today, be released on

                      anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

                      (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where

                      the case is pending/successor court in connection with

                      Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 248 of 2022 subject to the conditions

                      as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

                                   7. Accordingly,         the    instant   anticipatory   bail

                      application stands allowed.



                                                              (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.