Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 16001–16200
The City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) filed a review petition after an earlier unsuccessful round before the Supreme Court, alleging factual errors in the judgment concerning continuous employment. The petitioner claimed the findings were factually incorrect but failed to pinpoint …
The petitioners, Dr. Karnam Gunashekaran Rudrapillai and others, filed a writ petition against Optima Life Sciences Pvt Ltd and others. The High Court examined whether the writ petition should be entertained given the existence of a related execution petition. The Court held that, considering the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a limited direction to the Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) of Purandar, Pune, to decide a representation submitted on 25 May 2026. The petition highlighted that the SDO had issued a notice on 29 May 2026 but had not yet disposed of the representation. The …
The petitioner, defendant No.2, challenged an order that had forfeited his right to lead evidence after he failed to cross‑examine the plaintiff’s witness. He argued that the plaintiff’s affidavit filed in lieu of examination‑in‑chief was not an affidavit of evidence under Order XVIII of the CPC, …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against the estate of the late Shri Namdeo Budhaji Patil and others, but filed the appeal after a considerable delay. The appellant sought condonation of the delay and also applied for interim relief pending the …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against the estate of the late Shri Namdeo Budhaji Patil and others, but filed the appeal after a considerable delay. The appellant sought condonation of the delay and also applied for interim relief pending the …
Usha Deepak Sapkal filed a writ petition (No. 10643 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court against Anil Prabhakar Sinkar and others. The petition was argued before the Court by counsel Mr. Bhavin Gada and associates. The Court examined the petition and concluded that it was wholly frivolous. …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by 23‑year‑old Deendayal Pawan Kumar Jora, accused No.4 in a case involving alleged jewellery fraud and offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya …
The appellant, Ramchandra Sangar, filed a first appeal (No. 2542 of 2005) seeking enhancement of a decree from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Alibag. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant on the hearing date of 18 August 2026 and again on 25 August 2026. The respondent, the Secretary …
Falak Furniturewala filed an anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court, which was rejected on the ground that he failed to disclose his criminal antecedents. The Sessions Court, however, directed him to file a fresh application with full disclosure, citing the Supreme Court’s decision …
Sunita Dilip Pawale filed a writ petition challenging a Small Causes Court order that rejected her application to amend the plaint. The amendment sought to introduce a declaration that a 2009 sale deed was not binding, implicating the alleged marriage of Alka Darwatkar and the deceased father of the …
Mahesh Vaswani filed a Civil Revision Application No.452 of 2026 before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant, through counsel Ashutosh Shukla, Shreya Tiwari and Sumangala Yadav, sought leave to withdraw the revision. The Court considered whether it could exercise its discretion to permit …
Several writ petitions were filed challenging the State's handling of private forest lands under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975. The High Court had earlier directed the State to set up a Scrutiny Committee to examine cases for compliance with …
The applicant, Deepak Bheemrao Katarkar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a sexual assault case (CR No.37 of 2026) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant …
The petitioner, Ketan Jitendrabhai Patel, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking speedy disposal of his bail application pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate Court. He had been in custody since 31 March 2026, and his bail application filed in June 2026 remained unresolved for …
The petitioners, Clariant Chemicals India Ltd, sought to challenge a reference order dated 10 September 2015, alleging that the respondents were not employees of the petitioners but of contractors, and that the dispute concerned their demand for regular appointment despite alleged medical unfitness. …
The applicant, Chavad, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a NDPS case (CR No.841 of 2023) involving alleged possession of 2.62 grams of contraband and charges under Sections 8(c), 17(C) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and …
The petitioner, Sagar Kalidas Kalbhor, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed in arbitral proceedings, alleging that he was not afforded an effective opportunity of hearing. The High Court, noting the nature of the impugned order, declined to entertain the petition in substantive terms. …
The Bombay High Court considered the bail application of Ramesh Kaliyan Arjun, a 21‑year‑old accused of offences under Sections 64(m) and 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, for alleged sexual relations with a 15‑year‑old girl. The prosecution …
The petitioner, Imran Hussain Khan, challenged an order dated 29 June 2026 of the Additional Special Judge (MCOC), Thane, which cancelled his bail bond and that of co‑accused Mahendra Jayprakash Sing on the ground of their absence. The trial court justified the cancellation by noting the case’s …
Pravin Shrinivas Mahajan was arrested on 5 May 2021 for murder under Section 302 IPC and has been in custody for over five years. He filed an application for enlargement of bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arguing that the prolonged pre‑trial detention violates …
The Bombay High Court considered an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for bail of a 19‑year‑old accused charged under Sections 109, 351(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for assault causing simple and grievous injuries. The prosecution …
The Bombay High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vaishnavi Suraj Shivale under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. She is alleged to be connected to a case in which her husband, Suraj Ramdas Shivale, promised to secure a government job for a payment …
Portium Finance Ltd, through Kanchan Prakash Patole, filed a Section 14 application under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 on 16‑02‑2026 before the Judicial Magistrate, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Silvassa. The application was …
The petitioners, Sudarshan Colorants India Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Tribunal, Thane's order dated 15 April 2026 which rejected their application to implead a contractor as a party to a reference concerning the respondents' demand for reinstatement and permanency. The …
The petitioner, Supriya Pramod Jaware, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition and to pursue alternative remedies. The primary issue before the court was whether it could grant such …
The applicant, Ganesh Ashok Londhe, filed an interim application (praecipe) seeking correction of the operative order dated 25th August 2026. The applicant contended that Criminal Case No. 737/PW/2002 was omitted from clause (i) of the order granting bail. Counsel for the applicant submitted that …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by 23‑year‑old Deendayal Pawan Kumar Jora, accused No.4 in a case involving alleged jewellery fraud and offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya …
The petitioners, Trimurti Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and another, applied to Savitribai Phule Pune University for approval of seven new law courses on 30 September 2025. The university failed to forward the application to the State (Respondent No.3) within the statutory deadline, and only forwarded a …
The petitioner, Bharat Subhash Dange, filed a writ petition challenging his termination from service. The High Court observed that the termination had already taken effect, rendering the relief sought in the petition infructuous. Nonetheless, the Court noted that the petitioner could still pursue an …
Karan Ravindra Sorate filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The Court, initially not inclined to grant bail, heard the counsel's request to withdraw the application. Permission to withdraw was granted by the Court. Consequently, the …
Karan Haresh Bhoir filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal of a pending anticipatory bail petition. Relying on its …
The applicant, Akhilesh Yognarayan Mishra, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The respondent State counsel observed that the application omitted disclosure of the applicant's criminal antecedents. On this basis, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw …
Petitioners Vasant Appaji Kolekar and another filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners, through their counsel, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The court accepted the request and, on the petitioners' instructions, disposed of the petition as …
The petitioner, a third‑party occupier of a secured asset under a leave‑and‑licence agreement, sought a writ under Article 226 to restrain the bank's physical possession of the asset scheduled for 29 August 2026. The bank had acted under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of …
The petitioners sought a court order to terminate a 23‑week pregnancy of petitioner No.1, who suffers from complex congenital heart disease and severe pulmonary vascular disease, constituting a Class‑III risk to her life. The State of Maharashtra opposed the termination. The High Court examined a …
The petitioners, members of Dhanlakshmi Co‑operative Housing Society, were levied a penalty of Rs 15,45,730 for allegedly parking a bicycle in the staircase for eleven years. The society issued recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, which the Deputy Registrar …
The petitioners, Laxmi Chandrakant Nandu and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. They later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to raise all issues before the Deputy Registrar in the remanded proceedings. …
The petitioner, Girdhari Lal Goenka, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the legality of an order dated 30 September 2013 that initiated proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The petition was filed on 4 September 2023, more than ten years after the order, …
The petitioners, United Sales Corporation, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and the Defence Estate Officer. The Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the petition. The petitioners, through their advocate, offered an undertaking to …
Petitioner Bharat Shantilal Shah filed a writ petition seeking permission to travel to Dubai from 14 August to 30 September 2026 to visit his critically ill brother. The Respondent argued that the petitioner should have first approached the Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court and that the writ petition …
The petitioners Bhakti Abhijit Jadhav & Ors. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking correction of a clerical error in an order dated 25 August 2026. The order mistakenly recorded the date "12th May 2025" in the third line of paragraph 2 instead of the correct date "12th May …
The petitioners, original borrowers, filed a writ petition seeking to restrain the Bank of India from auctioning a secured asset, arguing urgency as the auction was scheduled for the same day. The bank had issued a notice of sale, and the petitioners had already approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal …
The petitioner, Smt. Naina Rasiklal Modi, filed a writ petition seeking directions to prevent her eviction and to have her application for transfer of premises considered by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA). The petitioner argued that the application, filed on 29 July 2026, was after the …
The petitioner, Suryama Mahendrakumar Deshmukh, sought relief from eviction by filing an application on 2 June 2026 for transfer of his premises under the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA). The respondent SRA argued that such an application could be entertained only after the lock‑in period had …
The petitioner, Mr. Waman Poma Rathod, filed a writ petition seeking relief from eviction and directed the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to consider his application for transfer of premises filed on 28 July 2026. The petitioner argued that the application was filed after the statutory lock‑in …
The petitioner, Rajesh Sharma, filed a contempt petition against the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC). ESIC filed an affidavit-in-reply and an interim application seeking to implead National Building Construction Company (India) Ltd (NBCC) as a third respondent. The court disposed of …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed an appeal against Shri Balaram Narayan Patil and others. The respondents filed interim applications (Nos. 11339 and 11340 of 2025) seeking various reliefs, including representation of legal heirs. The Court allowed …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed an appeal against Shri Balaram Narayan Patil and others. The respondents filed interim applications (Nos. 11339 and 11340 of 2025) seeking various reliefs, including representation of legal heirs. The Court allowed …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal (No. 1718 of 2019) and several interim applications against Atul Chintaman Savaliram Gawali and others. The court considered Interim Application No. 3209 of 2025 and allowed it in accordance with prayer clauses (a) to (d). Interim Applications Nos. 3210 …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal (No. 1718 of 2019) and several interim applications against Atul Chintaman Savaliram Gawali and others. The court considered Interim Application No. 3209 of 2025 and allowed it in accordance with prayer clauses (a) to (d). Interim Applications Nos. 3210 …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal (No. 1718 of 2019) and several interim applications against Atul Chintaman Savaliram Gawali and others. The court considered Interim Application No. 3209 of 2025 and allowed it in accordance with prayer clauses (a) to (d). Interim Applications Nos. 3210 …
The petitioner, Sanjaykumar Kotak Thakkar, challenged an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State GST that was issued on the same day a summary of grounds was served, following a show‑cause notice dated 21‑Jan‑2025. The petitioner contended that he was not afforded a reasonable …
The applicant, Rakesh Raghvendra Devadiga, sought bail in a criminal case (Cr. No.290 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64, 123, 308(2), 308(3) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant administered a stupefying substance, raped the victim, …
The petitioners, original accused in several cheques‑bounce cases totaling Rs.2 crore, challenged a 26 December 2019 order that condoned delay in withdrawing complaints filed in Pune and re‑filing them in Mumbai. They argued that the trial court had proceeded without hearing them and that the …
The petitioners, original accused in several cheques‑bounce cases totaling Rs.2 crore, challenged a 26 December 2019 order that condoned delay in withdrawing complaints filed in Pune and re‑filing them in Mumbai. They argued that the trial court had proceeded without hearing them and that the …
The petitioners, original accused in several cheques‑bounce cases totaling Rs.2 crore, challenged a 26 December 2019 order that condoned delay in withdrawing complaints filed in Pune and re‑filing them in Mumbai. They argued that the trial court had proceeded without hearing them and that the …
The petitioners, original accused in several cheques‑bounce cases totaling Rs.2 crore, challenged a 26 December 2019 order that condoned delay in withdrawing complaints filed in Pune and re‑filing them in Mumbai. They argued that the trial court had proceeded without hearing them and that the …
The petitioners, original accused in several cheques‑bounce cases totaling Rs.2 crore, challenged a 26 December 2019 order that condoned delay in withdrawing complaints filed in Pune and re‑filing them in Mumbai. They argued that the trial court had proceeded without hearing them and that the …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal (No. 1718 of 2019) and several interim applications against Atul Chintaman Savaliram Gawali and others. The court considered Interim Application No. 3209 of 2025 and allowed it in accordance with prayer clauses (a) to (d). Interim Applications Nos. 3210 …
The applicants, who purchased the entire disputed land during the pendency of a suit for specific performance, sought leave to appeal a decree of the Appellate Court that affected their title. The plaintiff argued that the purchase violated the injunction and Section 52 of the Transfer of Property …
The High Court of Bombay entertained an interim application (No. 3163 of 2025) filed in First Appeal No. 139 of 2024. The court allowed the interim application and directed the appellants to make the required amendment to the appeal within four weeks. A cross objection (St.) No. 28377 of 2024 was …
The petitioner, Praful Umarshi Thakkar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During proceedings, counsel informed the court that the petitioner had passed away. The counsel further stated that despite efforts, the legal heirs of the deceased could not be identified or contacted. The court …
The applicant, Uday Ghanshyam Naik, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 22‑day delay in filing a second appeal under Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The respondent, Chandan Shanti Group of Companies, opposed the application. The court examined the length of the delay and the …
The applicant, Salman Mohammed Umar Dhukka, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. He later sought permission to withdraw the application, citing that other co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail, making his application redundant. The respondent, the …
The appellant, son of the deceased, appealed an acquittal of two relatives who were charged under Section 304 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the death of Uttam Kolhe. The trial court had found no intention or knowledge to cause death and held that the death resulted from a natural …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Deputy Collector, filed an appeal against the deceased Kai. Shivdas Tukaram Ulvekar. An interim application was filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The Court, after considering the application, condoned the delay, allowed the interim …
The High Court considered bail applications filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Vaibhav Sanjeevan Chede (23) and Abhishek Anil Nagwade (24), who were accused under Sections 8(c) and 20(c) of the NDPS Act for possession of 97.895 kg of ganja, a commercial …
The High Court considered bail applications filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Vaibhav Sanjeevan Chede (23) and Abhishek Anil Nagwade (24), who were accused under Sections 8(c) and 20(c) of the NDPS Act for possession of 97.895 kg of ganja, a commercial …
The State of Maharashtra, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against a judgment and award dated 19 July 2014 concerning land acquisition compensation. The reference court had enhanced the compensation to Rs. 1,95,740, which was slightly more than three times the original amount …
The State of Maharashtra, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against a judgment and award dated 19 July 2014 concerning land acquisition compensation. The reference court had enhanced the compensation to Rs. 1,95,740, which was slightly more than three times the original amount …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), appealed against the estate of the deceased Shri. Pandurang Dadya Tandel Sinde. The appeal involved procedural orders concerning interim applications and the filing of a paper book. The court allowed Interim …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), appealed against the estate of the deceased Shri. Pandurang Dadya Tandel Sinde. The appeal involved procedural orders concerning interim applications and the filing of a paper book. The court allowed Interim …
Mrs. Tilottama Ganesh Landge owned land reserved for a 7.50‑metre road widening under a Development Plan notified on 18 September 1995. The ten‑year period for acquisition expired on 19 September 2005, after which she served a purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town …
The petitioners, a family of landowners, owned land reserved in 1995 for a 7.50‑metre road widening under the Development Plan of Pimpri‑Chinchwad. The ten‑year period for acquisition expired in 2005 and, after a long delay, the petitioners served a purchase notice under Section 127 of the …
The petitioners, a family of landowners, owned land reserved in 1995 for the widening of an 18‑metre HCMTR road under the Development Plan of Pimpri‑Chinchwad. After the statutory ten‑year period expired in 2005, they served a purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town …
The High Court, hearing two interim applications in writ petitions filed by PNB Housing Finance Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra and others, noted that earlier orders dated 12 August 2026 directed that physical possession of the secured assets be handed over to the petitioner, a secured …
The High Court, hearing two interim applications in writ petitions filed by PNB Housing Finance Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra and others, noted that earlier orders dated 12 August 2026 directed that physical possession of the secured assets be handed over to the petitioner, a secured …
The petitioner, Ganesh Narayan Patil, filed a writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and to contest a summary report dated 17 October 2023 filed by the Investigating Officer before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kurla. The petitioner’s counsel, Ashok Kumar Dubey, requested this …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a civil matter before the Bombay High Court, with respondents filing a cross objection. An interim application was filed and the court, after considering the pleadings, allowed the interim relief sought. The court also condoned the delay in filing the first appeal. …
The appellant, an Executive Engineer, filed interim applications (Nos. 1084 and 1085 of 2019) seeking relief in a civil appeal against the respondents. The court examined the appellant's reasons for the delay in filing the appeal and considered whether interim relief could be granted subject to …
The appellant, an Executive Engineer, filed interim applications (Nos. 1084 and 1085 of 2019) seeking relief in a civil appeal against the respondents. The court examined the appellant's reasons for the delay in filing the appeal and considered whether interim relief could be granted subject to …
The appellant, an Executive Engineer, filed a first appeal (ST) No. 26577 of 2019 against respondents including Pathan and others. The appellant sought condonation of delay in filing the appeal, an order for filing the paper book within a year, and ad‑interim relief after depositing the decretal …
The appellant, an Executive Engineer, filed an appeal beyond the prescribed period and sought condonation of delay. The appellant also applied for interim relief concerning a decretal amount with interest, and for directions to file the paper book within a year. The court examined the reasons …
The petitioner, Daya Niwas B Wing Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Deputy Commissioner of Police and others. After the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal (St.) No. 9067 of 2019 against Atul, Chandrakant Shankar Mhatre and others, together with several interim and civil applications. The appellant sought relief on procedural grounds, including service of certain respondents by hand delivery and the filing …
The petitioner, an employee of the Union Territory of Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu, challenged an order dated 15 March 2024 that transferred his services to Diu. He filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief from the transfer. The Court noted the Supreme Court's decision …
The applicants filed a suit in 2015 for specific performance of a 2002 Memorandum of Understanding with the landlords (respondents 1‑3). In 2022 the landlords filed eight eviction suits in the Small Causes Court, Mumbai, under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The applicants sought, under Section 24 …
The applicants, Rajkumar Rampher Pandey and others, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, the applicants' counsel requested permission to withdraw the application while preserving the right to examine the investigating officers if …
The High Court of Bombay considered a bail application filed by Kisan Nagnath Pawar under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a police case (CR No. 839 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 302, 307, 323, 324 and 34. The applicant sought release …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by 22‑year‑old Aditya Ravi Bhujbal, the principal accused in a violent incident involving a scythe that resulted in the victim’s death. The charges include IPC sections 307, 504, 506, 34 (later upgraded to 302), sections 4 and 25 of the Arms …
Rajendra Bonde filed a writ petition (No. 88 of 2020) in the Bombay High Court against Waman Hari Dhumase and others. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date, as had also occurred in a prior adjournment. No arguments or evidence were presented. Consequently, the court, …
M/s. Trigyn Technologies Ltd. filed a commercial arbitration petition against the Chief Executive Officer of Nashik Municipal Smart City Development Corporation, alleging misconduct by the previously appointed sole arbitrator, a retired judge. The petitioner later filed an affidavit withdrawing all …
Vivek Bhila Naik filed a criminal bail application before the High Court of Bombay. His counsel, Mr. Sumit Patil, sought leave to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court, citing a change in circumstances. The Court considered whether …
The Bombay High Court disposed a group of three bail applications filed by employees of F6 Capital & Finance Pvt. Ltd., who were accused of creating a parallel company, EXPNP Experty, and diverting 82 clients, causing a notional loss of Rs.16,40,003. The prosecution argued that the offences were …
The petitioner, Sarjerao Bhaguji Bhosale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel applied for leave to withdraw the petition, stating that the relief sought had become infructuous. The sole issue before the Court was whether the petition …
Dr. K. Sudhakar Reddy filed an interim application (No. 850 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against People Education Society. The petitioner requested the Court to remove certain office objections that were pending. The sole issue before the Court was whether to grant a further …
Multiple applicants had filed anticipatory bail applications in the High Court of Bombay. During the pendency of these applications, the charge‑sheet was filed against them. The applicants, on their counsel's advice, sought permission to withdraw the pending anticipatory bail applications and to …
The applicant, Saurbh Dadya Dnyaneshwar Golesar, was charged under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of a woman on 8 August 2021. The prosecution alleged that the applicant was present outside the victim's house while a co‑accused committed the murder. The …
The petitioner, Dipchand @ Prakash Punamchand Laddha, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. During the pendency of the case, the parties reached a compromise on 18th August 2025. The petitioner's counsel, Anshuman Deshmukh, applied to withdraw the writ petition on the basis of the …
The applicant, Motilal Tukaram Bandebuche, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court and subsequently sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court on new grounds. The applicant was represented by Ms. Anjali Shaw and Ms. Kavita D. …
Rahul Dattatraya Pal filed a criminal bail application before the High Court of Bombay. His counsel, Nilesh Navale, sought permission to withdraw the application while requesting liberty to file a fresh bail petition if the trial does not conclude within nine months from the date of withdrawal. The …
The Bombay High Court considered two bail applications filed by Vishal Jadhav and Durgesh Sarwjeet Singh, accused of operating an illegal call centre that allegedly defrauded Canadian nationals. The prosecution charged them under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prevention of …
The petitioner, Hemal Kishor Barchha, filed a criminal writ petition seeking an expedited trial of Criminal Case No.1907/PW/2017 pending before the 26th Judicial Magistrate First Class, Borivali since 2017. The petition argued that the prolonged delay violated the right to a speedy trial. The High …
Mahesh Krishna Rao Bandi filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The court observed that the application had already been disposed of in a prior proceeding. Consequently, the court did not pass any further order. No discussion of facts or legal arguments was recorded. …
Pandurang Chaitya Sawar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the dismissal of a reference by the Labour Court for non‑prosecution. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ petition while retaining the liberty to approach the Labour …
The applicant, convicted of murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302 and 307 of the IPC, applied for suspension of his sentence and bail pending appeal. He contended that key eyewitnesses were interested parties and that the evidence contained contradictions, also urging release after six …
The High Court considered several anticipatory bail applications filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of these applications, a charge‑sheet was filed, prompting the applicants to seek permission to withdraw the pending applications and file fresh bail …
The applicant, Vijaykumar Suryaman Patel, filed an interim application seeking modification of his bail condition to allow attendance at the police station until the charge was framed. The bail condition required him to appear at the police station, and he requested a relaxation of this requirement. …
The petitioner, Gwendoline Maria Fernandes, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the petition remained unprosecuted. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by …
The Bombay High Court disposed a group of three bail applications filed by employees of F6 Capital & Finance Pvt. Ltd., who were accused of creating a parallel company, EXPNP Experty, and diverting 82 clients, causing a notional loss of Rs.16,40,003. The prosecution argued that the offences were …
The petitioner, Mohammed Furqan Qureshi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. After the Supreme Court decided the case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798), the petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition. The High Court, after …
The Bombay High Court considered two bail applications filed by Vishal Yadav and Durgesh Singh, accused of operating an illegal call centre that allegedly defrauded Canadian nationals. They were charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the …
The High Court considered an application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for bail to Dilip Ramesh Nihal, who is charged with offences under Sections 304, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant suffers a serious leg injury requiring multiple orthopedic surgeries, as …
The petitioner, M/s Achal Housing LLP, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear at multiple scheduled hearings on 16 June, 29 June, 6 July, and again on 24 August 2026, indicating a loss of interest in prosecuting the petition. The court noted the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition but failed to appear or prosecute the matter. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, indicating loss of interest. The respondent State was represented by Adv. A.I. Patel and Savita A. Prabhune. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. …
The petitioner, Gagan Solitaire CHS Ltd., challenged an order dated 5 September 2023 issued by the District Deputy Registrar, Palghar and the Competent Authority that granted a certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance of 3,143 sq. m. of land to the respondent housing society. The challenge was …
The petitioner, Gagan Solitaire CHS Ltd., challenged an order dated 5 September 2023 issued by the District Deputy Registrar, Palghar and the Competent Authority that granted a certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance of 3,143 sq. m. of land to the respondent housing society. The challenge was …
The applicants Vyankat Vitthal Jadhav & Ors. filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants, Mr. Hrishikesh Ghorpade, requested to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and found no impediment to allowing …
The Bombay High Court considered three bail applications filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 181 of 2025 concerning alleged fraudulent appointments of teachers and illegal receipt of salaries. The prosecution argued that certain accused …
The petitioner challenged a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and an assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147. The petition was filed on 26 March 2026, a day after the assessment order dated 25 March 2026. The petitioner’s counsel sought to …
The applicant, Sahil alias Chocolate Balu Kondke, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant was represented by Ms. Nishi Singhvi, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by Mr. Amit A. Palkar. The court noted that the application was withdrawn by the applicant …
The Bombay High Court heard a large batch of writ petitions concerning the status of private forest lands in Maharashtra. The Court noted that the matters are governed by the Supreme Court decisions in Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Rohan Vijay Nahar & Ors. v. State …
The applicant, New Khwaja Garib Nawaz CHS, filed an interim application seeking restoration of its writ petition that had been dismissed on 4 March 2026 for want of prosecution. The petition had been dismissed because the applicant failed to pursue the proceedings. The learned counsel for the …
The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Santosh Pandurang Rathod and Ravikant Pandurang Rathod, accused under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34 for alleged fraud in a land sale. The complaints were filed by two complainants who claimed misrepresentation and breach of promise in a …
The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Santosh Pandurang Rathod and Ravikant Pandurang Rathod, accused under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34 for alleged fraud in a land sale. The complaints were filed by two complainants who claimed misrepresentation and breach of promise in a …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The State of Maharashtra issued resolutions on 1 April and 2 April 2026 disqualifying a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools from grant‑in‑aid and directing cancellation of their recognition if they failed to apply under the Maharashtra Self‑Finance Schools (Establishment and …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The appellants, heirs of protected tenants, sought a temporary injunction to restrain respondents (CIDCO and others) from further development of Plot No.20D, Airoli, pending a suit challenging mutation entries and claiming ownership under a Section 32M certificate of the Maharashtra Tenancy and …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Dnyaneshwar Trimbak Yadav (Accused No.2) in a case alleging cheating of Rs.52 lakh from seven depositors, with charges under IPC Sections 406, 420 and 34. The applicant …
Ushik Mahesh Gala, accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, was arrested in 2025 and subsequently granted interim medical bail for gall‑bladder surgery. After undergoing additional hernia surgery in July 2026, he applied for an enlargement of medical bail, citing morbid obesity …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
KEC International Ltd filed writ petitions challenging actions of the Union of India and other respondents. The petitioner argued that the appellate authority had already passed an order allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to the Assessing Authority for processing a refund claim. The High …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
Harsimransingh Ajitsingh Sethi, an under‑trial accused of NDPS offences involving alleged commercial quantity, had been in custody for 3 years 11 months without charge being framed and with 79 prosecution witnesses pending. He sought bail under Section 493 of the CrPC, invoking the discretion …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The applicant, Girish Surajprasad Pandey, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 300‑day delay in filing a criminal revision (Stamp No. 9441/2024). The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the application. Both parties presented arguments before Justice Shivkumar Dige. The …
The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal application seeking leave to appeal an acquittal order dated 7 November 2025 passed by the Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.416 of 2019 against respondents Priya Gopi Naik and another. The High Court examined the impugned judgment and the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The Administrator of the Union Territory of Daman and Diu filed an interim application in a writ petition (No. 11546 of 2016) filed by the legal representatives of the deceased Minoo Firoze Dadysethna. The applicant sought relief to restore the writ petition and to obtain an extension of time to …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The applicant, Tausif @ Chuha Jameer Sayyed, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for offences including sections 310(4) and 223 of the same Act, sections 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act, provisions of the Maharashtra Police Act, Arms Act and MCOC Act. He had been in …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The State of Maharashtra issued resolutions on 1 April and 2 April 2026 disqualifying a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools from grant‑in‑aid and directing cancellation of their recognition if they failed to apply under the Maharashtra Self‑Finance Schools (Establishment and …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The applicant, Sonu Kumar Dharmendra Shah, filed an interim bail application (No. 4014 of 2024) before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Ms. Mallika Sharma, sought leave to withdraw the interim application, stating the court was not inclined to entertain the prayer. The court …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
Mahendrasingh Devisingh Rathod, an under‑trial accused of offences under Sections 8(c), 22(c), 23(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act, had been in custody for 3 years 11 months and 2 days with the charge sheet not yet framed and 79 witnesses to be examined. He filed a bail application under Section 493 of the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The applicant, Farida W/o Naim Khan, a 69‑year‑old senior citizen, was implicated in a suicide case where her daughter‑in‑law, Nazmin Kasif Khan, allegedly suffered ill‑treatment and was driven to self‑destruction. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with her son‑in‑law (Accused No.1), …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
The petitioners – a group of primary, secondary and higher secondary schools – challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered automatic cancellation of their recognition for failing to submit applications under the …
