Bombay High Court
SANDEEP SITARAM AMBREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- ANTICIPATORY BAIL REJECTED
Holding
The application for anticipatory bail was rejected.
Summary
The applicant, Sandeep Sitaram Ambre, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a cheating case (Crime No. 217 of 2026) registered under Sections 316(4), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR, based on a complaint by a senior HR director of Vertiv Multi National Company, alleges that the applicant diverted salary payments amounting to Rs 7.91 crore into his personal accounts, returned only Rs 2.13 crore, and issued cheques that were subsequently dishonoured. The applicant contended that the matter was a civil dispute, the alleged confession was not voluntary, and he was willing to refund the remaining amount, seeking bail. The State opposed, highlighting the deliberate deception, the large unrecovered sum of Rs 5.78 crore, the dishonoured cheques, and the applicant's alleged absconding. The Court examined the FIR and found prima facie evidence of cheating, noting the applicant's lack of cooperation and the seriousness of the offences. Consequently, the Court held that custodial interrogation was warranted and that the applicant had not established a case for anticipatory bail. The anticipatory bail application was therefore rejected.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 in view of the alleged cheating offences under the BNS, 2023.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 316(4), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- cheating
- misappropriation of funds
- civil dispute
- confession
- absconding
- custodial interrogation
- Section 482
- BNSS 2023
- BNS 2023
Judgment
910-ABA-2360-2026
Harish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2360 OF 2026
Sandeep Sitaram Ambre ...Applicant
V/s.
The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Prashant Suryawanshi i/b Gajanan Savagave, for the Applicant.
Ms. Poonam Bhosale, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 21ST AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :-
1. Heard Advocate Prashant Suryawanshi, learned counsel for the
applicant and Advocate Poonam Bhosale, learned APP for the
Respondent-State.
2. The applicant has filed the instant application under Section 482
of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, apprehending
arrest in Crime No. 217 of 2026, dated 01.07.2026, registered with Wagle
Estate Police Station, Thane for the offence punishable under Sections
-1-
910-ABA-2360-2026
316(4), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3) and 340(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
(BNS), 2023.
3. The FIR came to be registered on the basis of a report lodged by
Ms. Jennin Fernandes, who is working as a Senior Director (HR) of a
Company by name Vertiv Multi National Company, located at Thane.
She has alleged in the report that this applicant was working as Senior
Manager in the Company since 2017. In the month of November, 2025,
the Senior Manager (Treasury and Banking) had informed the H.R.
department that an amount of Rs. 6,83,08,313/- has been transferred to
the account of this applicant which was maintained with Standard
Chartered Bank during the period from 2021 to 2025 and further an
amount of Rs. 1,08,62,362/- has been transferred to his another account.
On inquiry in this regard, it was noticed that the amount towards full and
final payment of the staff of the company who has left the company, was
repeatedly diverted from the company's bank account to the individual
accounts of the accused/this applicant. It is alleged that on questioning to
the applicant in this regard, he had confessed that he had diverted the
amount to his own account and expressed readiness to refund the amount.
On the basis of his readiness he had returned an amount of Rs.
-2-
910-ABA-2360-2026
2,13,00,000/- out of total amount of Rs. 7,91,70,675/-, but failed to return
an amount of Rs. 5,78,70,675/- and thus it is alleged that the applicant
has committed the offence of cheating along with other offences.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the allegations in
the FIR are in the nature of civil dispute and even a separate suit bearing
no. 5690 of 2026 is pending before this Court. He also submitted that the
alleged confession is not voluntary and cannot be made the basis for
initiating prosecution against him. He also submitted that the applicant
has showed his bonafides by returning an amount of Rs. 2,13,00,000/-
and is ready to return the remaining amount. He, therefore, prayed for
grant of anticipatory bail.
5. As against this, learned APP for the respondent opposed the
application and pointed out that there are specific allegations about the
acts of cheating by this applicant. She also submitted that this applicant
carried the intention to deceive since beginning and has dishonestly
transferred huge amounts to his personal accounts. She also submitted
that the cheques issued by the applicant for refund of the amount also got
-3-
910-ABA-2360-2026
dishonored and further that the applicant is absconding. Hence, she
submitted that the custodial interrogation of this applicant is necessary.
6. Perused the FIR and the documents placed on record. The report is
lodged by a Senior Official of the company making specific allegations
against this applicant showing his deceitful acts. There are specific
allegations against this applicant that he has diverted the amount of full
and final salaries of the retired employee in his account, on the basis of
fabricated vouchers. The amount misappropriated by this applicant is
huge and although he has stated that he has returned an amount of Rs.
2,13,00,000/-, it is undisputed that he has failed to return the remaining
amount of Rs. 5,78,70,675. Apart from this, the cheques issued by this
applicant to return the amount have also been dishonored and it is thus
prima facie evident that the applicant has cheated the company. The
entire conduct on the part of the applicant appears to be a calculated plan
to commit cheating and cause wrongful gain to himself.
7. It has also to be noted that the applicant has himself returned an
amount of Rs. 2,13,00,000/- and as such, at this stage his contention that
the confession was not voluntary cannot be accepted. Further, since the
-4-
910-ABA-2360-2026
learned APP has also pointed out that the applicant is absconding, it has
to be noted that the applicant has not extended any co-operation to the
investigating agency.
8. Considering the nature of offence against the applicant and his
entire conduct in engaging in deceitful means, the custodial interrogation
of this applicant is warranted. Hence, considering the entirety of factors,
I am of the opinion that the applicant has failed to make out any case for
grant of anticipatory bail.
9. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is rejected.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
-5-
Checking your session…