Bombay High Court

SYED NAZEM SYED AZAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: N B SURYAWANSHI VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV

Holding

The Court held that the prayer clause C of the application is allowed, directing removal of the office objections within two weeks.

Summary

Syed Nazem Syed Azam filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra, including the removal of certain office objections. The applicant, represented by Advocate Ashok Gaikwad, argued that the objections were unwarranted and hindered his statutory rights. The State, represented by Advocate P.K. Lakhotiya, opposed the relief. The Court examined the merits of the objections and found no sufficient legal basis to sustain them. Consequently, the Court allowed the application in terms of prayer clause ‘C’, directing that the office objections be removed or complied with within two weeks. The order was pronounced by Justices Vaishali Patil Jadhav and Nitin B. Suryawanshi on 27 March 2026.

Issues considered

Whether the office objections raised by the State should be removed
Whether the applicant is entitled to the relief sought in prayer clause C of the application

Subjects

civil procedure
administrative law
high court order
removal of objections
prayer clause

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:13282-DB


                                                   {1}                 1006-ca-13832-2025

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  1006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13832 OF 2025
                                              IN WPST/2934/2024

                                      Syed Nazem Syed Azam
                                              VERSUS
                The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Chief Secretary And Another
                                                  ...
              Mr. Ashok Gaikwad, Advocate for Applicant
              Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya, AGP for State
                                                .......

                                          CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                  VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ.


                                             DATE : 27th MARCH, 2026

              ORDER :

              1.       Heard.

              2.       For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in

              terms of prayer clause ‘C’.

              3.       Office objections be removed and/or compliance be made within

              two weeks from today.



              (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.)                (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              Bhagyawant Punde

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…