Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GANPAT MADHAV BAWGE THR HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY GUNDAPPA MADHAV BAWAGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR DIST LATUR AND ANR

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The Court held that the delay in filing the first appeals is condoned subject to payment of costs and an undertaking not to claim statutory benefits or interest.

Summary

The original claimants, who were agriculturists whose lands were acquired, filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their first appeals against the acquisition proceedings. The Court examined whether the delay could be excused and under what conditions. It held that the delay may be condoned provided the applicants deposit a cost of Rs. 2,000 each to a designated charitable fund and execute an undertaking not to claim any statutory benefits or interest for the period of delay. Accordingly, the applications were allowed, the delay was condoned, and the first appeals were ordered to be registered. The civil applications were thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in filing the first appeals against land acquisition can be condoned under the applicable procedural law
  • Whether the applicants may be barred from claiming statutory benefits and interest as a condition for condoning the delay

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • land acquisition
  • civil procedure
  • first appeal
  • statutory benefits
  • interest

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12415


                                             1           901-CA 16659-2022+.odt



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16659 OF 2022
                                        IN FAST/31937/2022

                 Ganpat Madhav Bawage
                 Through his Power of Attorney
                 Gundappa Madhav Bawage                             .. Applicant

                      Versus

                 The State of Maharashtra and another               .. Respondents
                                               WITH
                               CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16660 OF 2022
                                        IN FAST/31999/2022
                 Rameshwar Ganpatrao Bawage
                 Through his Power of Attorney
                 Gundappa Madhav Bawage                             .. Applicant

                      Versus

                 The State of Maharashtra and another               .. Respondents

                                               WITH
                               CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16661 OF 2022
                                        IN FAST/32004/2022

                 Ashwini Ganpat Bawage
                 Through his Power of Attorney
                 Gundappa Madhav Bawage                             .. Applicant

                      Versus

                 The State of Maharashtra and another               .. Respondents

                                               WITH
                               CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16662 OF 2022
                                        IN FAST/32008/2022
                              2              901-CA 16659-2022+.odt


Gundappa Madhav Bawage                                  .. Applicant

     Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another                    .. Respondents

                              WITH
              CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3322 OF 2026
                     IN X-OBJ(ST)/7074/2026
                          FA/1337/2021
Dagdu Ramsing Bayas
Died, Through L.Rs.
Smt. Nilabai Dagdusingh Bayas and another               .. Applicants

     Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others                     .. Respondents

Mr. N. D. Kendre, Advocate for Applicants.
Mr. A. S. Deshpande, Advocate h/f Mr. Amit S. Deshpande,
Advocate for Applicants in C.A. No. 3322/2026.
Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Vinod P. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
Mr. B. R. Surwase, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 in C.A. No.
3322/2026.

                      CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                              SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.
                       DATE       :   18th MARCH, 2026.

PER COURT :-

1.   All these applications are filed by the original claimants

whose lands were acquired and references were allowed to certain

extent. By way of these applications, the claimants are seeking

condonation of delay caused in filing the first appeals.              The

claimants are the agriculturists.      They lost their lands in the
                                 3              901-CA 16659-2022+.odt


acquisition proceedings.


2.       In view of the same, this Court is inclined to allow the

applications subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2,000/- (Rs. Two

Thousand only) each to be deposited in the account of Creche/

Day Care Centre, Advocates Association of Bombay High Court,

Aurangabad. It is also further made clear that, the applicants shall

file an undertaking to be kept in the main appeal stating that they

will not claim any statutory benefits and interest for the period of

delay.


3.       With this, the civil applications stand allowed.         Delay is

condoned. Office to register first appeals.


4.       The civil applications stand disposed of.



( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)                    ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )




P.S.B.


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.