Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAVIKIRAN BUDHA AHIREversusTHE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA THROUGH REGIONAL MANAGER AND ANOTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The application is deemed infructuous and is therefore disposed of.

Summary

The applicant, Ravikiran Budha Ahire, filed Civil Application No. 216 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent, Central Bank of India, was represented by Advocate Dr. S. G. Nandedkar. The respondent's counsel appeared before the Court, indicating that the matter could be resolved without further proceedings. The Court held that the appearance of the respondent's advocate rendered the application infructuous. Consequently, the Court disposed of the application as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the civil application should be entertained after the respondent's counsel appeared, rendering it infructuous

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • infructuous application
  • application disposal
  • court jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:1993-DB


                                                                             216.26ca
                                                  (1)

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                            12 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 216 OF 2026
                                     IN/WITH WP/5357/2016

                                 RAVIKIRAN BUDHA AHIRE
                                         VERSUS
                       THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA THROUGH REGIONAL
                                 MANAGER AND ANOTHER
                                                 …..
                Mr Sahil Sunil Jawale, Advocate h/f Mr R. O. Awasarmol, Advocate
                for Applicant
                Dr. S. G. Nandedkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1
                                                …..

                                         CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT
                                                       AND
                                                 SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.

                                           DATE : 17th JANUARY 2026

                PER COURT :-


                1.          Learned Advocate Dr. Nandedkar submits that he has

                instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.1.


                2.          In view of the same, this application becomes infructuous

                and the same is disposed of as infructuous.




                [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.]                     [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]

                sjk


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.