Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VITTHAL PARVATI BHAGAT AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court condoned the delay and allowed the civil application as per the prayer clauses B, C, and D.

Summary

The applicants, Vitthal Parvati Bhagat and others, filed a writ petition (Stamp No.23751 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was delayed, and the respondents raised objections to the filing. The Court, after hearing the matter, exercised its discretion to condone the delay in filing the application. It allowed the civil application in accordance with the prayer clauses B, C, and D, directing that any objections be removed within two weeks. The Court also directed the petitioner to file typed copies of the annexures on which reliance is sought. Consequently, the relief sought by the applicants was granted subject to compliance with the Court's directions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in filing the civil application should be condoned
  • Whether the relief sought in prayer clauses B, C, and D should be granted

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • civil application
  • writ petition
  • High Court order
  • relief
  • annexures

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:16907-DB


                                                {1}                     ca4496-26.doc
                 drp
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4496 OF 2026
                                              IN
                             WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.23751 OF 2025

                 Vitthal Parvati Bhagat and Others                      APPLICANTS

                        VERSUS

                 The State of Maharashtra and Others               RESPONDENTS

                                               .......
                 Mr. Amol K. Gawali, Advocate for the Applicants
                 Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent - State
                                               ....…

                             [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
                                       VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.]

                                     DATE : 18th APRIL, 2026
                 ORDER :

                 1.     Heard.


                 2.     For the reasons stated in the Application, delay is
                 condoned. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer
                 clauses “B”, “C” and “D”.


                 3.     Objections shall be removed within two weeks.


                 4.     Petitioner may file typed copies of the annexures on which
                 he seeks to rely upon.



                 [ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ]            [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
                           JUDGE                                   JUDGE

                 drp/ca4496-26.doc


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.