Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NAMDEO DNYANBA MOTEKAR DIED THROUGH LRS SUNDARBAI N MOTEKAR AND OTHERSversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court allowed the application for amendment as prayed in Clause B, directing that the amendment be effected within four weeks.

Summary

The case concerned the death of Namdeo Dnyanba Motekar and involved a civil application and writ petition filed against the Union of India and other respondents. The applicant sought relief and an amendment as specified in Clause B of the prayer. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard the matter on 10 July 2026. The applicant was represented by Mr. Shubham Dattatrya Jayabhar, while the respondents were represented by Mr. S.R. Wakale and Mr. Rahul Bagul. The Court allowed the application in terms of prayer Clause B and directed that the amendment be effected within four weeks. No detailed reasoning was recorded in the excerpt.

Subjects

  • civil application
  • writ petition
  • High Court
  • Bombay
  • amendment
  • judgment

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:27789-DB
                                             1                          27.CA.6931.26.odt

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6931 OF 2026
                                         IN WP/15125/2023
                                               WITH
                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 15125 OF 2023

                          NAMDEO DNYANBA MOTEKAR DIED THROUGH
                           L.R.s SUNDARBAI N MOTEKAR AND OTHERS
                                           VERSUS
                                THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

                                                   ...
                       Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shubham Dattatrya Jayabhar
                             AGP for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S.R. Wakale
                        Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 3 : Mr. Rahul Bagul
                                                   ...

                                     CORAM        : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                    ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                     DATE         : 10.07.2026

             PER COURT:

             1.             Heard.

             2.             For the reasons stated in the application, the same is

             allowed in terms of prayer Clause ‘B’. Amendment to be carried out

             within a period of four (4) weeks.




             (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                  (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




             habeeb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.