Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRADIP CHANDRAKANT MEKHE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court condoned the delay subject to deposit of Rs.3000 cost and removal of office objections, thereby restoring the writ petition.

Summary

The petitioners, Pradip Chandrakant Mekhe and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, which later faced procedural delays. They moved a civil application seeking condonation of the delay, arguing that the lapse should not prejudice their substantive rights. The State of Maharashtra, represented by its Secretary, opposed the condonation, contending that procedural rules must be strictly observed. The Court examined whether the delay could be excused and whether imposing a cost condition was appropriate. It held that the delay could be condoned provided the petitioners deposited Rs.3000 with the Advocates’ Association within two weeks and removed any office objections within four weeks. Consequently, the civil application was allowed, and the writ petition was restored to its original position subject to the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in filing the civil application for condonation can be condoned
  • Whether the imposition of a cost deposit is a proper condition for condonation
  • Whether the writ petition can be restored to its original position upon condonation

Subjects

  • delay condonation
  • civil application
  • writ petition
  • cost deposit
  • High Court procedural order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:33248-DB
                                                     1                        11.doc



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                          11 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7630 OF 2026
                                    IN WPST/13807/2025

                  PRADIP CHANDRAKANT MEKHE AND OTHERS
                                 VERSUS
       THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                              ...


           Advocate for the Applicant : Ms. Vaishali S. Swami h/f. Mr. Swami Mahesh
                                        Chandrashekhar
                          AGP for Respondent/State : Ms.V.S. Choudhari
                                               …
                                            CORAM        : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                           ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                              DATE       : 31.07.2026

                  PER COURT :
                 .      For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the delay is
                 condoned, subject to deposit of cost of Rs.3000/- with the Advocates’
                 Association of Bombay High Court, At Aurangabad, within a period of
                 two (02) weeks from today. Subject to removal of office objections
                 within a period of four (04) weeks, Writ Petition is restored to its
                 original position. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause
                 ‘B’.




                 ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. )               ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )




   vsj..


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.