Bombay High Court
BHUPENDRA KASHINATH AABHANE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the delay is condoned, the prayer clauses may be corrected, and the writ petitions are restored to their original position, with office objections to be removed within four weeks.
Summary
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay heard a series of civil applications (writ petitions) filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicants were represented by Mr. S. U. Chaudhari, assisted by Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, while the State was represented by different Advocate Generals in each petition. The Court granted leave to correct the prayer clause in the petitions, condoned the delay in filing, and restored each writ petition to its original position. It further directed that any office objections raised by the respondents be removed within four weeks. Finally, the Court ordered that all the civil applications be disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay in filing the writ petitions can be condoned.
- Whether the prayer clause in the petitions may be corrected.
- Whether the office objections raised by the respondents should be removed.
- Whether the writ petitions should be restored to their original position.
Subjects
- writ petition
- civil application
- condonation of delay
- correction of prayer clause
- office objections
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:13317-DB
{1} ca9095-25.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9095 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8963 OF 2025
Bhupendra Kashinath Aabhane and Another APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9097 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8953 OF 2025
Sangita Babulal Bhamre and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mrs.V.S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9098 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8965 OF 2025
Suvarna Uttam Bhamre and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondent - State
{2} ca9095-25.doc
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9099 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8955 OF 2025
Sitadevi Ganesh Chaure and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9100 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8964 OF 2025
Sharad Devidas Jadhav and Another APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mrs. V.P. Dama, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9102 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8962 OF 2025
Shashikant Ramdas Patil and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. M. A. Aher, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9103 OF 2025
IN
{3} ca9095-25.doc
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8959 OF 2025
Vipul Suresh Navale and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9104 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8952 OF 2025
Manisha Ramdas Borse and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9114 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8958 OF 2025
Magan Shankar Rathod and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.]
DATE : 27th MARCH, 2026
{4} ca9095-25.doc
ORDER :
1. Leave to correct prayer clause.
2. Heard.
3. For the reasons stated in the Applications, delay is
condoned, the Writ Petitions are restored to their original
position.
4. Office objections to be removed within four weeks.
5. Civil Applications are disposed of.
[ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/ca9095-25.doc
Checking your session…