Bombay High Court
SANGITA BABULAL BHAMRE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court condoned the delay, allowed correction of the prayer clauses, restored the writ petitions to their original position, directed removal of office objections within four weeks, and disposed of the civil applications.
Summary
Several groups of applicants filed writ petitions (Civil Applications No. 9095-9114 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. The petitions were challenged on procedural grounds, including alleged delay in filing, errors in the prayer clause, and pending office objections. The Court, after hearing counsel, exercised its discretion to condone the delay, allowing the petitions to be restored to their original position. It also granted leave to correct the prayer clauses in the petitions. The Court directed that all office objections be removed within four weeks. Finally, the Court ordered the disposal of all the civil applications.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay in filing the writ petitions can be condoned
- Whether the prayer clause in the petitions may be corrected
- Whether the writ petitions can be restored to their original position
- Whether pending office objections should be removed
Subjects
- Writ Petition
- Delay Condonation
- Prayer Clause Correction
- Office Objections
- Civil Application
- Procedural Law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:13318-DB
{1} ca9095-25.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9095 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8963 OF 2025
Bhupendra Kashinath Aabhane and Another APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9097 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8953 OF 2025
Sangita Babulal Bhamre and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mrs.V.S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9098 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8965 OF 2025
Suvarna Uttam Bhamre and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondent - State
{2} ca9095-25.doc
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9099 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8955 OF 2025
Sitadevi Ganesh Chaure and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9100 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8964 OF 2025
Sharad Devidas Jadhav and Another APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mrs. V.P. Dama, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9102 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8962 OF 2025
Shashikant Ramdas Patil and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. M. A. Aher, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9103 OF 2025
IN
{3} ca9095-25.doc
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8959 OF 2025
Vipul Suresh Navale and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9104 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8952 OF 2025
Manisha Ramdas Borse and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9114 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8958 OF 2025
Magan Shankar Rathod and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.]
DATE : 27th MARCH, 2026
{4} ca9095-25.doc
ORDER :
1. Leave to correct prayer clause.
2. Heard.
3. For the reasons stated in the Applications, delay is
condoned, the Writ Petitions are restored to their original
position.
4. Office objections to be removed within four weeks.
5. Civil Applications are disposed of.
[ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/ca9095-25.doc
Checking your session…