Bombay High Court
MANISHA RAMDAS BORSE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court condoned the delay, permitted correction of the prayer clause, restored the writ petitions to their original position, ordered removal of office objections, and disposed of the civil applications.
Summary
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay entertained a series of civil applications and writ petitions filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants sought relief including correction of the prayer clause and removal of office objections. The respondents raised objections on procedural grounds, particularly the delay in filing. The Court, after hearing counsel, exercised its discretion to condone the delay and allowed the correction of the prayer clause. Consequently, the writ petitions were restored to their original position and the Court ordered that the office objections be removed within four weeks, after which the civil applications were disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court may condone delay in filing civil applications and writ petitions.
- Whether the prayer clause in a writ petition may be corrected after filing.
- Whether office objections raised by the respondents should be removed.
Subjects
- writ petition
- civil application
- delay condonation
- prayer clause correction
- office objections
- procedural law
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:13324-DB
{1} ca9095-25.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9095 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8963 OF 2025
Bhupendra Kashinath Aabhane and Another APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9097 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8953 OF 2025
Sangita Babulal Bhamre and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mrs.V.S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9098 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8965 OF 2025
Suvarna Uttam Bhamre and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondent - State
{2} ca9095-25.doc
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9099 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8955 OF 2025
Sitadevi Ganesh Chaure and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9100 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8964 OF 2025
Sharad Devidas Jadhav and Another APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mrs. V.P. Dama, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9102 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8962 OF 2025
Shashikant Ramdas Patil and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. M. A. Aher, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9103 OF 2025
IN
{3} ca9095-25.doc
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8959 OF 2025
Vipul Suresh Navale and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9104 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8952 OF 2025
Manisha Ramdas Borse and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9114 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.8958 OF 2025
Magan Shankar Rathod and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. U. Chaudhari h/f Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, Adv.for Applicants
Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.]
DATE : 27th MARCH, 2026
{4} ca9095-25.doc
ORDER :
1. Leave to correct prayer clause.
2. Heard.
3. For the reasons stated in the Applications, delay is
condoned, the Writ Petitions are restored to their original
position.
4. Office objections to be removed within four weeks.
5. Civil Applications are disposed of.
[ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/ca9095-25.doc
Checking your session…