Bombay High Court

SUHAS PRABHAKARRAO DHARASURKAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SANDIPKUMAR C MORE VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV

Holding

The court held that the petitioners had complied with the contempt order and therefore disposed of the petition.

Summary

The petitioners, Suhas Prabhakarrao Dharasurkar and others, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 105 of 2020) against the State of Maharashtra and others, alleging non-compliance with a prior contempt order. The learned counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the petitioners had complied with the contempt order. The court examined whether the compliance was satisfactory. Finding that the petitioners had indeed complied, the court held there was no further ground to continue the contempt proceedings. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioners have complied with the order of contempt issued by the court

Subjects

contempt
compliance
petition disposed

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:34266-DB

                                                       911 CONT. PETITION NO. 105 OF 2020



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                911 CONT. PETITION NO. 105 OF 2020
                                         IN WP/6403/2019

                             Suhas Prabhakarrao Dharasurkar And Others
                                               Versus
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                   __________________________________________________________
                   Adv. Sandeep B. Sontakke for the Petitioners
                   Mr. V. V. Jahagirdar, AGP for State
                   __________________________________________________________


                                       CORAM   : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATE    : 06.08.2026

                   PER COURT :

                   1]          Learned    counsel    for   the     petitioners,      on

                   instructions, submits that order under contempt has been

                   complied with.

                   2]          Contempt Petition, therefore, stands disposed of.



                   (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)            (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                             JUDGE                            JUDGE




                        Komal Kamble                                           Page|1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…