Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJENDRA VITHAL KUNTE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the petitioners have complied with the contempt order, the petition stands disposed.

Summary

The petitioners, Rajendra Vithal Kunte and another, filed a petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition arose from an order of contempt that had been previously imposed on the petitioners. The petitioners, through counsel, submitted that they had fully complied with the contempt order. The court examined the submission to determine whether the compliance was satisfactory. Finding that the petitioners had indeed complied, the court held there was no further ground for the petition. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners have complied with the order of contempt
  • Whether the petition should be dismissed on account of such compliance

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • petition disposal
  • compliance

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:24296-DB


                                           1                 11 cp 167-18

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                11 CONT. PETITION NO. 167 OF 2018
                                        IN WP/13328/2017

                        RAJENDRA VITHAL KUNTE AND ANOTHER
                                           VERSUS
                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                              ...
            Mr. Biradar R. D., Advocate for the Petitioners
            Mr. S. B. Jadhav, AGP for Respondent-State
            Mr. A. R. Salve, Advocate for Respondent No.2
                                              ….

                                         CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                         DATED : 22/06/2026
            P. C. :

                         Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits
            that the order under contempt has been complied with. In view of
            the same, the petition stands disposed of.




            ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

            VS Maind/-


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.