Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LAXMIBAI PANDURANG MORE THROUGH LRS SUBHASH PANDURANG MORE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Compliance with the contempt order results in disposal of the petition.

Summary

The petitioners, Laxmibai Pandurang More and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 273 of 2018) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petition arose from an order of contempt that had been directed against the petitioners. The petitioners, through counsel Abhijit S. More, informed the court that they had complied with the contempt order. The learned counsel for the State, Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, appeared for the respondents. The court, noting the compliance, held that the purpose of the contempt order was fulfilled. Accordingly, the court disposed of the contempt petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed upon the petitioners' compliance with the contempt order

Subjects

  • contempt
  • petition disposed
  • compliance
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:25963-DB

                                                                        925.cp. 273.2018



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          925 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 273 OF 2018
                                    IN WP/11459/2014

                              Laxmibai Pandurang More Through LRs
                               Subhash Pandurang More And Others
                                             VERSUS
                               The State Of Maharashtra And Another

                   __________________________________________________________
                   Adv. Abhijit S. More for the Petitioners
                   Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for State
                   __________________________________________________________


                                     CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                     DATE      : 2nd JULY, 2026

                   PER COURT :

                   .              Learned   counsel   for   the   petitioners,      on

                   instructions, submits that the order under contempt has

                   been complied with. In view of the same, Contempt Petition

                   stands disposed of.




                   [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]            [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE]
                             JUDGE                            JUDGE




                   Komal Kamble                                                   1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.