Bombay High Court
AJAY SUNIL NAINWADversusDINESH B TIDKE JOINT COMMISSIONER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is disposed as the order under contempt has been complied with.
Summary
Ajay Sunil Nainwad filed a contempt petition (No. 307 of 2026) against Dinesh B. Tidke, Joint Commissioner. The petitioner alleged that an order under contempt had been breached. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Yashraj D. Joshi, submitted that the order had been complied with. The court considered the submission that compliance had occurred. In view of the compliance, the bench disposed of the petition without further order.
Issues considered
- Whether the order under contempt has been complied with as alleged by the petitioner
Subjects
- contempt
- petition
- compliance
- high court
- disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:31042-DB
307.2026CP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
31 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 307 OF 2026
IN WP/439/2025
AJAY SUNIL NAINWAD
VERSUS
DINESH B TIDKE JOINT COMMISSIONER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Yashraj D. Joshi h/f
Mr.Chandrakant R. Thorat
AGP for Respondent/State : Mrs. M.N. Ghanekar
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 27.07.2026
P.C. :
1] Learned counsel Mr. Joshi holding for Mr. Thorat,
learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, submits that
the order under contempt is complied with.
2] In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
sga
Checking your session…