Bombay High Court
RAVINDRA UKHDU SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is disposed because the petitioner has complied with the contempt order and nothing remains to be decided.
Summary
The petitioner, Ravindra Ukhdu Salve, filed a contempt petition (Cont. Petition No. 512 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The court examined the submission and found that there was no remaining issue or relief to be granted. Consequently, the court held that the petition could not proceed further. The judges ordered that the petition stand disposed as there was nothing left to adjudicate.
Issues considered
- What is the effect on a contempt petition when the petitioner has complied with the contempt order?
Subjects
- contempt
- petition disposal
- compliance
- high court order
Judgment
(1)
994- C.P. 512-2014.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
994 CONT. PETITION NO. 512 OF 2014
IN WP/7160/2013
RAVINDRA UKHDU SALVE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
…..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Viraj S. Yelmame h/f
Mr. Mahesh S. Deshmukh
AGP for Respondent/State: Mrs. Chaitali R. Chaudhari
….
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 18, 2026
ORDER:-
1. The learned counsel holding for Mr. M. S.Deshmukh, for the
petitioner submits that order under contempt is complied with, and
therefore, nothing survives in this petition.
2. In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
YSK/
Checking your session…