Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SURESH TUKARAM MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed as the contempt order has been complied with.

Summary

Suresh Tukaram More filed a continuous petition (No. 545 of 2016) arising out of WP/8247/2013 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner alleged that the State of Maharashtra had not complied with an earlier contempt order. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the contempt order had now been complied with. The Court examined the submission and found that the compliance was satisfactory. Consequently, the Court ordered that the petition stand disposed. The judgment was delivered by Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Abasaheb D. Shinde on 30 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the State of Maharashtra complied with the earlier contempt order

Subjects

  • contempt
  • compliance
  • petition disposal
  • High Court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                 (1)
                                                 921 C. P. 545-2016.odt
       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

               921 CONT. PETITION NO. 545 OF 2016
                        IN WP/8247/2013

                       SURESH TUKARAM MORE
                                VERSUS
          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sahebrao A Nagarsoge
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. G. A. Kulkarni
                                   ...

                    CORAM :    SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                               ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

                    DATED :    APRIL 30, 2026

ORDER:-

       The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order

under contempt is complied with. In view of the same, the petition

stands disposed .



(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE)                   (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                    JUDGE




YSK/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.