Bombay High Court

DUSANE EDUCATION SOCIETY DUSANE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SANDIPKUMAR C MORE ABASAHEB D SHINDE

Holding

The petition is disposed without granting the requested time.

Summary

The petitioners, Dusane Education Society and others, filed Contempt Petition No. 600 of 2018 seeking time concerning an order under contempt related to a 2017 approval proposal. The petition was heard by a bench of Justice Sandipkumar C. More and Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde. Counsel for the petitioners requested an adjournment. The court observed that the nature of the contempt order required a decision on the approval proposal and therefore did not grant the requested time. The petition was subsequently disposed of on April 30, 2026.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioners should be granted time/adjournment in a contempt proceeding concerning the 2017 approval proposal
Whether the petition should be disposed without further hearing

Subjects

contempt
petition
approval
high court
adjournment
disposal

Judgment

                                   (1)
                                                    950- C. P.600-2018.odt
       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                950 CONT. PETITION NO. 600 OF 2018
                        IN WP/13502/2017

DUSANE EDUCATION SOCIETY DUSANE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
                     AND OTHERS
                                          ….Petitioners
                       VERSUS

          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                                     …..Respondents
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. R. K. Kharat h/f Mr. V.S. Panpatte
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. P. Sonpawale
                                 ….

                   CORAM :       SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                 ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

                   DATED :       APRIL 30, 2026

ORDER:-

1.     Though the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time, but

considering the nature of order under contempt, which is for deciding

the proposal of the petitioners about approval, given in the year 2017,

it must have been decided

2.     In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of.




(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE)                     (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                      JUDGE




YSK/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…