Bombay High Court
Uttam S/o Sahebrao SalveversusManukumar Srivastava
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The contempt petition was disposed of as the order under contempt had been complied with.
Summary
Uttam S/o Sahebrao Salve filed a contempt petition against Manukumar Srivastava. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. S.K. Mathpati and Mr. Sandeep B. Sontakke, submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The respondents, represented by Mr. S.J. Salgare, were not required to appear further. The bench, comprising Justices Sandipkumar C. More and Abasahab D. Shinde, examined whether the petition should proceed in light of the compliance. Finding that the statutory requirements of the contempt order were satisfied, the court held that there was no longer any ground for the petition. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of. The decision was delivered on 9 March 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed after the petitioner’s compliance with the contempt order
Subjects
- contempt
- civil procedure
- petition disposal
- compliance
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:10175-DB
1 140.CP.692.25.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONT. PETITION NO. 692 OF 2025
IN WP/11019/2019
UTTAM S/O SAHEBRAO SALVE
VERSUS
MANUKUMAR SRIVASTAVA
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Mathpati h/f.
Mr. Sandeep B. Sontakke
AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.J. Salgare
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 09.03.2026
PER COURT:
Learned counsel Mr. Mathpati holding for Mr. Sontakke,
on instructions, submits that the order under contempt has been
complied with. In view of the same, the contempt petition stands
disposed of.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.)
habeeb/
Checking your session…