Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHUBHAM ARVIND PATILversusSHRI RANJIT SINGH DEOL THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION AND

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is withdrawn and disposed of as the order under contempt has been complied with.

Summary

The petitioner, Shubham Arvind Patil, filed a contempt petition (No. 872 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, asserted that the order under contempt had been fully complied with and that no further relief was required. The respondent, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, did not contest the claim of compliance. The Court examined the submission and found no remaining issue in the petition. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition to be withdrawn and ordered its disposal.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed on the ground that the order under contempt has been complied with.

Subjects

  • contempt
  • petition withdrawal
  • compliance
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                              (1)
                                              907 CP-872.2025.odt
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

        907 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 872 OF 2025
                  IN WP/666/2025

                  SHUBHAM ARVIND PATIL
                          VERSUS
 SHRI RANJIT SINGH DEOL THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION
                       AND OTHERS
                             …
       Mr. Rohit Narwade, Advocate for the petitioner.
       Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondent-State.
                             ...

                CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                        ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

                DATED : 23 JANUARY 2026.

Per Court :

1.    Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,

submits that the order under contempt has been complied

with and nothing remains in this petition.

2.    As such, the contempt petition stands withdrawn and

disposed of.



(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE)                (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
     JUDGE                                  JUDGE




VD_Dhirde


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.