Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANANDRAO SITARAM JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposal
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

Holding

Compensation is to be enhanced by 70% with interest under Sections 28 and 34 payable from the date of award, but no interest or statutory benefits for the delayed period.

Summary

The appellant, Anandrao Sitaram Jadhav, appealed a 2016 judgment seeking a higher compensation for land acquired for the Lendi Major Project. The original award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act was Rs.1,71,649, which the reference court had enhanced by 40%. Relying on a recent decision that enhanced compensation by 70% for similar villages, the appellant argued for parity. The High Court allowed the appeal in part, directing that the compensation be further enhanced to 70% and that interest under Sections 28 and 34 be awarded from the date of the original award, but denied interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. The court also ordered the appellant to pay any deficit court fees and directed the award to be redrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appellant is entitled to the same 70% enhancement in compensation as granted to other villages in the same project (principle of parity).
  • Whether interest under Sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act is payable on the enhanced compensation.
  • Whether statutory benefits and interest for the period of delay are applicable.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • land acquisition
  • compensation enhancement
  • parity principle
  • interest
  • statutory benefits
  • Section 11
  • Section 28
  • Section 34

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:27876
                                                                                916-fa-1405-2025.odt
                                                      (1)


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1405 OF 2025
                                      Anandrao Sitaram Jadhav
                                               VERSUS
                                 The State Of Maharashtra And Ors
                                                  ...
                 Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Laxmi Thakur h/f Mr. Patil Laxmikant C.
                         AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.R. Yadav Lonikar
                     Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Ms. Suvarna M. Zaware
                                                  ...
                                             CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                               DATED : JULY 10, 2026

                 PER COURT :-

                 1.         Heard both sides finally with their consent.

                 2.         Being     aggrieved   by         judgment     and   order      dated

                 22.02.2016 passed in L.A.R. No.300 of 2007, present appeal is filed

                 for enhancement of compensation.

                 3.         The land of the appellant measuring 2.H. 60 R. from Gat

                 No.178 has been acquired from Village Bhaswadi (Itgyal), Taluka

                 Mukhed, District Nanded for “Lendi Major Project”. The notification

                 was issued on 29.01.1998. The award under Section 11 was passed

                 on 30.03.2003. The SLAO awarded compensation of Rs.1,71,649/- in

                 aggregate for land, trees and well. The Reference Court enhanced it

                 by 40% by impugned judgment. The appellant is claiming

                 enhancement by 70%.

                 4.         Reliance    is   placed         on   common    judgment        dated

                 12.12.2025 passed in First Appeal No.257 of 2023 with connected

                 matters. Those were the matters in respect of acquisition of lands
                                                                   916-fa-1405-2025.odt
                                            (2)


from self-same project from village Bhingoli, Taluka Mukhed, District

Nanded. This Court enhanced the compensation by 70%. It has been

specifically recorded that cluster of villages is affected because of

project in question and lands from various villages including

Bhaswadi are acquired. On ground of parity, appellant is also entitled

to have same rate and enhancement in compensation. I, therefore,

pass following order:

                                        ORDER

             (i) First appeal is allowed partly.
             (ii) The compensation granted by Reference court shall stand
             enhanced to further 70%.
             (iii) Save and except above modification, rest of award under
             challenge shall stand unaltered.
             (iv) The appellant shall be entitled to interest under Section
             28 and 34 from date of award as per law laid down by Full
             Bench in case of State of Maharashtra Vs. Kailash Shiva Rangari
             [2016 AIR (Bom.) 141].
             (v) The appellant shall not be entitled to interest and statutory
             benefits for delayed period.
             (vi) The appellant shall pay deficit court fees, if any.
             (vii) Award be drawn accordingly.
             (viii) Record and proceeding be sent back to concerned Court.



                                                  (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)




Mujaheed//


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.