Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DEEPALI AMAR KAMBALE EARLIER MISS DEEPALI DADASO TODKARversusAMAR LAHU KAMBLE

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court allowed the condonation of the 28‑day delay in filing the Family Court appeal.

Summary

The applicant filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 28‑day delay in filing a Family Court appeal. The respondents opposed the application, arguing that the delay was unacceptable. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, despite the opposition, decided to allow the application. Consequently, the interim application was disposed in favour of the applicant. The court also scheduled the main Family Court appeal for 9 March 2026 at 2.30 p.m.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 28 days in filing a Family Court appeal can be condoned

Subjects

  • Family Court appeal
  • condonation of delay
  • interim application
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                         15 ia-11032-2025(c).doc


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11032 OF 2025
                                  IN
              FAMILY COURT APPEAL [ST.] NO. 28625 OF 2025

Deepali Amar Kamble.                                 ...Applicant.
        Versus
Amar Lahu Kamble and Another.                        ...Respondents.
                                  ——————
Mr. Nagesh Chavan, Ms. Ankita Chindage and Mr. Abhang Suryawanshi for the
Applicant.
Mr. Swapnil Lokare i/b Mr. Ganesh Desai for the Respondent.
                                  ——————
                                    Coram :     Madhav J. Jamdar &
                                                Pravin S. Patil, JJ.
                                    Date      : March 4, 2026.
P. C. :

1.         Heard Mr. Chavan, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant.

There is delay of 28 days in iling the Family Court Appeal. Mr. Swapnil

Bhokare, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents strongly

opposes the application.         However, for the reasons set out in the

interim application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

2.         Interim application stands disposed of.

3.         List the Family Court Appeal on 9th March 2026 at 2.30 p.m.



     [Pravin S. Patil, J.]                       [Madhav J. Jamdar, J.]




Patil-SR                             1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.